Anyone know of a template (with stims and blank lines) to do translation drills?
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
I've driven for more than a decade and never heard of a parking citation being given by anyone other than police....even if I illegally entered a private parking lot, the parking lot would call the police....
Really like when you guys do review questions like this...it helps not to forget former lessons...only critique is there should maybe be more review questions like this one throughout the curriculum.
#feedback
One thing that could help Tom's argument is saying that "Rolanda is assuming all streets are straight." Because a different house could have a smaller yard but, because of the curvature of the road, is farther than 20 feet from the street. So it doesn't lose any of its property to the city and it's "smaller" yard has more land for private use.
"He cannot kill both Arya and Sansa."
Would this be group 4 because it's "not both"???
I got this wrong because I didn't like the conflation of "eliminating" and "avoiding" but I guess they are similar enough...
Can someone please explain to me why "the only" is group 1 but "only" is group 2? Thanks!
Am I wrong in assuming that combining both predicates with "and" sometimes implies that the first predicate caused or led to the second.
For example:
"The man used 7sage and got a 180 on the LSAT."
That sentence has a different implication than if it were two sentences:
"The man used 7sage." "The man got a 180 on the LSAT."
I feel like in the example in the video too, it can be read that cats harmonizing helped them take over the world.
Seems like this lesson is missing answers and also the ability to speed up the video.
Is it a safe assumption that "affect" here is "negatively affect"? I mean the stim says the bus drivers complain....why would they complain if the presence of a supervisor is positively affecting their performance?
Am I wrong in assuming that A is also wrong because it says "one time or another" which means we don't even know if A is referring to our ancestors....
This is a "most justified" question, but am I right in assuming the answer would be correct even if we delete the "most"???
Maybe another issue with D is that it says "suited" and not "needed" for diving.
Some examples would be very helpful here. #feedback
I think another thing wrong with A is that the premise talks about what year the marks were made in the sandstone, not the age of the sandstone itself. Choice A specifically refers to the age of the sandstone.
Am I wrong in assuming that C would actually weakens the argument? Because it's sort of the opposite of the conclusion...
Would another reason A could be wrong is because the limits of stealing thunder really isn't the main part of the argument?