Good luck!
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
I don't believe financial risk is a necessary condition for the argument to apply. C would work and is not the right answer only because B is a situation where the principle would be even more "usefully invoked."
If the LSAC has considered retracting this question, it probably is a question that should be retracted.
For Q2, even if choice A says responsibilities to the society and to the client, E would have to be the right answer since it is necessary for the author to think E in order for the argument to stand. A (revised) would just be a sufficient assumption.
Seriously most test takers understood this passage entirely differently than LSAC, but guess what, LSAC wins, cause the LSAT is not a democracy.
I wish there is a reason for E to be wrong.
I think one can easily argue that AC B is the implied right answer for question 13 because the author talks extensively about how the ideal way of archiving things, namely to sort the essential out from all the records, is virtually impossible. AC B is not perfect, but neither is AC E anyway.
Another ridiculous question. B and C are logically on par because the LSAC fails to define both "maintenance" and "negligence." It has the obligation to accept both as correct.
Would someone explain to me why this argument is flawed? I get that it's ridiculous, but I can't understand why. Thanks. #help (Added by Admin)
For question 14, D is the correct answer, not because D is the correct answer, but because the LSAC says D is the correct answer.