question- is it fair to say that most times on an LSAT when the answer choice is worded like this one to mention something to do with sufficient vs necessary conclusions as the error that that answer choice is the correct answer choice? Or is it just a pattern solely related with the type of problems i'm drilling maybe? #Help #Question

think the strat here is just find the answer that the pattern matches the stim. Like in this case it was most, most, most. E and D were both matching most, most, most, and E was better answer.

Why do we care about dairy's outside consequences, good or bad? There just didn't feel like a good answer for this one

this section is making me crash out!

Shoot, I originally read/understood that as "most businesses and factories in the region use ac". Obviously see my error now lol

Looking at it from the subject, predicate view helps so much

the amidala example just feels so knit-picky, like she can only give her speech unless the assassination fails. the assassination fails. So you would think she could then give her speech, but i guess lsat logic is then no she could be doing a million other things because surviving doesn't guarantee that she gives a speech?

You have a lot of time! Sounds cliché, but no need to worry about a test in June, or August in January. Try to operate in the being part of your brain, not the doing. Think about getting better in Janurary, in January, then worry about February 1st on Feb 1st, so on and so forth. Then day by day, the days will stack on top of each other, and the process will become second nature! It truly is one day at a time, and the only one that matters in terms of LSAT prep is the current day of improvement!