- Joined
- Dec 2025
- Subscription
- Live
Admissions profile
Applications
Discussions
Hi guys! Got my September LSAT score and is was a 146… I’ve been consistently PTing in the 160s with my highest PT at a 167. Any advice what I should do? How can this even be possible? So confused
Currently reading "in cold blood' by truman capote, lots of long sentences and broad range of new vocabulary terms
I'm also scared! I'm just going to try to focus on one question at a time, breathe, and manifest!
PT 156 is known to be one of the hardest PT's with lots of students showing a 6 or more point decrease in their scores so don't let one test discourage you!!!
Maybe this will help some people!: for analogy questions, if you're trying to help the argument then tighten the analogy (make relevant case more relevant) if you're trying to hurt the analogy make it actually not analogous.
But since this is a NA, we need to strengthen and make it more analogous
Where is the proof that there is similarly (analogously) selective memory bias? first half explains the patients and their medical status, second half explains babies born during full moons but also explains that staff remembers the nights with full moons more. Theres nothing in the first half that explains this selective memory bias. So, in order to strengthen (NA) we need to make them more alike so we need something that points to selective memory bias in the patients medical status part!! which is what B gets at
Any tips to avoid imposter syndrome or self-sabotage before the Sept test? I've been consistently getting in the 160s on PTs but have so much fear/doubt that I won't perform well on test day. Any advice is appreciated! Thanks
ONLY TWO TYPES OF THEORIES CAN BE ACCEPTABLE Soooooo if we know from the stimulus that Retributivist theories that hold that criminals should receive longer sentences for repeat offenses than for an initial offense violates the principle (harshness of punishment should be proportional to the seriousness of the offense), we can infer that is is acceptable instead to a rehabilitationalist theory since it is the REMAINING AND ONLY OTHER ACCEPTABLE THEORY.
A - WRONG - we dont know the specific content of rehabilitationalist theories
B - WRONG - the stimulus doesnt tell us what is required to reform a repeat offender
C - WRONG - we only know whats necessary, C is giving us the sufficient which we don't know what that is
D - WRONG - again we dont know what is sufficient
E - CORRECT - exactly as explained above, ding ding ding!
Any tips on how to effectively review RC wrong answers?
Am I wrong to assume that just because the company's profit was much smaller this year than it was last year doesn't conclude that profits went down?? It could've still increased just not as much right?
Can someone explain how E is a source attack? I'm not really understanding how E is correct here.
@Lizeth13 The way I saw it was OPA says unlikely and argument says unlikely. Answer choice B says cannot occur and unlikely to occur. Cannot occur and unlikely are not the same so B is wrong
Hello! I'm located in the Richmond, VA area and I'm currently registered for the September LSAT test date. I'm looking to get a score in the 160's and would love a group of people who can hold each other accountable/check-in/discuss any strategies or tips with one another. Feel free to join even if not in RVA!
Hi! Also not in Texas but taking the September LSAT! jennawiese10@gmail.com
RJ is the absolute best!!!