Is the cumulative GPA on the LSAC academic summary report out of 4.0 or 4.33?
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
I didn't really see in the stimulus the concept of "international?"
Hi everyone,
I just wanted to ask for some feedback or how people have normally done this in the past. My exam is November 2023 and I really really want to apply this cycle. The score is released November 29th and I want to get my application in ASAP so how should I be prepping my personal statements, letters of rec, etc. and like for which school? Should I just have a general idea of what I'm going to get and target schools in that range?
I'd love to prep in advance and not scramble in early December, but it's hard especially when I don't even know which school I'm applying to...
Any insight would be great :D
Thanks!
I was thinking for Choice C that it was irrelevant because the stimulus doesn't talk about insects living in homes without traps! But I can also see JY's interpretation of this.
This should be a 5/5 question pft
All of the answer choices, situationally, sound so funny to me
people who chose answer choice A --> the 'fish' that got baited
I think this is a weakening question in the sense that we're looking for an alternative reason as to why hard surface is beneficial for runners.
I got primarily confused with this question because I didn't think of it as a binary where if D is hired, then K is not... I thought that would have been an unwarranted assumption because where in the stimulus does it say that either or have to be hired...?
#help #feedback
I prefer to live on the moon, so in fact, answer E is relevant, thank you very much JY
On a side note, what does singletary mean?
I want to start taking PT but don't know where to start. I noticed that drill questions are taken from PT1-35... do people normally even use these as PT or start from PT36?
Thanks!
Could this also be a #s vs % question? Like if number of vehicles is decreasing over the years, then 35% of a smaller number wouldn't mean a decrease in the accidents perse? Like it would confound the relationship between the premise and the conclusion... Idk if that's even the correct interpretation.
Just a sidenote:
let's say it was
B → C
----
A → C
Could the assumption technically also be B → A and not necessarily A → B?
I'm guessing that this is a yes? Would the sufficient assumption then just be something that at least connects A and B? Or is the correct sufficient assumption also specific in the direction. But I guess it's more context-dependent?
I don't understand how museum's employees getting paid significantly more/less than minimum wage has any bearing on the museum-going public...
Hello! I just finished going over the informational videos for LR and wanted to crack down on some drills. I am concerned about using up questions from the new LSAT exams so what is the best way to create drill sessions with older PTs? I have having mixed info about whether the older ones are covered in PT 1-35 or PT 1-45. Also what are the PT with letter a (ie. A, B, C) instead of numbers?
Thank you!
~Lonelycarbon
Add me in please!!!
I'm on Monterey - is that okay?!
My dumbass thought question 20 meant "airtime" in the context of on airplanes. WOW
that stick figure doodle w the dots doe...
Would the 2nd half of the last sentence be an inference? 'indicating that they expect economic growth in the near future'
The way I approached this was just asking WHY the decision to restore the art is justified. BECAUSE someone tampered with it. If you switch it and ask yourself WHY someone tampered with it and say BECAUSE the decision to restore the art is justified... it doesn't really make sense!
I don't know if that's the right way to do it but that made the most sense to me
Let's say neither G nor K are in row 1. Does that mean these are the possibilities: G is not in row 1, or K is not in row 1, or both G and K are not in row 1? Could we have a situation where G is in row 2 and K could be in row 1? So if only one of the conditions are met, then the other item could or could not be in row 1?
I came across this type of logic in a logic game and got confused...
I think another reason why D is irrelevant is because it's talking about trade imbalances BETWEEN nations whereas the stimulus talks about "in some countries."
Is this correct?