interesting

What is up with this whack structure bro

I feel like understanding the difference between "always" and "sometimes" will be significant, especially when it comes to necessary assumption questions. To say that "physicians are always uncomfortable" would not be required, but to say that "sometimes uncomfortable" would be. Then again, would this be the kind of necessary assumption the LSAT would write? I feel like it's required for a premise and not necessarily the support in the argument.

I feel like this one could be simpler than the previous example because in this example there is no premise that supports the claim that the author seeks to discredit.

Went through v2 course only to get this wrong. I want my money back JY

Does "that" indicate a "necessary" part of a conditional statement?

I want my money back

I haven't critically observed enough JY explanations to confirm this beyond a doubt, but I have a suspicion that as he reads the question stem and finishes, his cursor always briefly goes over the correct answer choice before he examines the stimulus.

Does anyone have another LR question that isn't necessarily a weaken question but follows this same pattern of logical structure? I wanna see what it looks like in other contexts.

I always did wonder what the bar exam was exactly testing.