such a dumb mistake

most != often... noted

holy geography

it says that the stories are about "unchanging foibles of mortal beings," but couldn't mortal beings here be anything that can die? Or do we have to infer

straight POE :cry

@BaileyDixon I studied five hours a day with no breaks. I don't recommend it, but to fill my gaps, I found it helpful. I think if your score is not above 150 right now, then volume will be your friend. After you break 160, then untimed sections can be more helpful.

Just protect your peace too, though. This test is meant to be hard, and remember that it is not indicative of your intelligence and value!

I went from a 140 diagnostic to a 160 on the June sitting in a month and a half. Just know that if I can do it you can do it too! You got this :)

im so trash

holy cooked two star

Isn't D making a huge assumption... weird 2 star

@Hanifa I had the exact same thought. I think what helped me the most here is #1 POE and #2 understanding that the rule still supports the argument even if we assume that the primary purpose of the government is not to promote health because we know for sure that the primary purpose of private companies isn't to support health.

One thing I found really helpful is having the main point of the argument super clear (I do this through saying it out loud). If you really get the main point all the other question types really just fall into place.

Yes! It is intentional. Very sad :(

@IvonneRosario Oh sorry I didn't clarify! I meant while reviewing a section (I assume this video is just from the explanation tab)

I still don't understand. Even if it is right to say that technological innovations can be a stand in for modern methods of communication and transportation, we have no reason to believe that it is the case in this instance. We can improve modern methods of communication and transportation by building for tracks or by installing more phone booths to make it more accessible (an improvement). Please help!

I thought AC:C was wrong because it brough up the idea of democracy which was not discussed in the passage

Wednesday- m -> free poetry

poetry -> half price

chained conditionals: Wednesday -m-> free poetry -> half price

--

Wednesday -m-> half price (AC:D)

ts is fried

By compatibility does it mean that we should make lying to the pathological liar align with the first paragraph's statements or with Kant's statements? This is really a directionality question if that makes sense

great explanation

I'm confused here, because they didn't technically answer the question, so how can AC:A be correct

Prosperity is the state of flourishing, thriving, and experiencing success, particularly in financial or material terms. It goes beyond simple wealth accumulation, often encompassing overall well-being, good health, and peace.