i am having this issue as well!

i correctly chose B because i recognized the sufficiency necessary confusion by the author, but i hesitated in blind review because I was worried I was inserting personal bias in my answer choice. when i read the stimulus i thought " well we need more than JUST water to develop life, does it have an atmosphere, does it have sunlight?..." #help i find it hard to tell the difference between my inherent bias/assumptions and asking prompting questions related to holes/flaws in arguments. Thank you!

#feedback the explanation for #6 is not thorough at all, given so many people get it wrong it would've been helpful to watch an explanation pointing to where in the text A, B, C, and D can be found/inferred.

#help is there some sort of parameters for what a 'significant number' is?

so there is no concrete reason why #2 B is correct, just that all the other answers are wrong? oh boy.

#help i eliminated D because the author discusses instances where this technique would not be effective, and it appeared D ignored this exception to the rule. I understand why the other answers are incorrect but i struggle to understand why D is correct when it appears to be leaving out a portion of the authors stance towards stealing thunder. does this simply boil down to it being a "most accurately" question, thus the answer doesn't need to be 100%, just closer to accurate than all the other options? thanks!

I am confused by this question!!!!

Are being well organized and self motivated are not necessary for being highly successful? A says that if they are not sufficient (highly successful), and they fulfill one of the 1 necessary conditions (organized), they must fail the other (highly successful), is this false reasoning? how is this a reach?

In contrast i struggle to accept C because it hinges on the premise that no self motivated sales person regret their career choice, but don't you need to be self motivated AND organized to be highly successful, so how would C be correct when the premise it is founded on doesn't satisfy the necessary conditions of being successful?

I fear I am all twisted up. This is how i mapped out the stimulus

Well known> Successful > well organized + self motivated (because ALL are BOTH)

/successful /well organized + self motivated

Self motivated > /regret

first one i have gotten right in a while! hopefully this means i am getting better at SA, PSA, NA questions as i have found them to extremely difficult thus far

#help for Q3 'unless' is present, I know we were cautioned that these indicators don't ALWAYS indicate conditional rule (as unless is a G3 indicator) but I am confused about how this particular case wouldn't require us applying the negate sufficient rules (I had initially thought avail > /NA or /4+ weeks > bonded) I can tell this is wrong but I could use an explanation on why this logic is incorrect PLEASE!

the past three drills have severely impacted my confidence. I was not able to parce out the correct answer in blind review either. #help are there core drills I should be reviewing? I feel I am missing something here.

#feedback This video is very helpful! However the video is 7 minutes long and the lesson says it will only take 1 minute. Additionally I have watched this video 2-3 times and pressed the arrow onto the next lesson but 7sage is still not registering that I have completed this lesson.

Is part of the reason E is incorrect because in the passage critics are discussing the indifference of her novels to moral questions, whereas option E is addressing her motivation (which would thus be irrelevant because we are discussing her work). E is unnecessary because even if she wasn't intentionally addressing moral questions, if it is true that her work raised moral questions (for the reasons laid out in the argument, and the assumption in B) then the argument holds true that critics are unfair? Yes? Someone correct my reasoning if I am reaching too far.

on both this and the previous question, i have narrowed it down to the correct answer and the answer i chose, but in blind review and timed selection i maintain the wrong answer! i fear i am missing some critical step in comprehension that causes me to eliminate the right answer.

#Help !! Am i missing something in the text that implies Caligulas enemies are historians?? and not people of his own era?? when working out C i considered how the answer could imply that his enemies copied earlier works, but it also seemed just as likely that caligula, a cruel tyrant, took inspiration from previous cruel acts of tyants, because i had ASSUMED that his enemies were in his time period (and thus i was like well if his enemies had access to the documentation it is just as likely for Caligula to have access to the documentation). Whereas in the video JY attributes the explanation to historians reading the text and using them in their bias description of Caligula. I can see why C is right given this information about historian enemies, but am at a loss for where that can be found in the text (and how i can avoid this kind of mistake in the future)