User Avatar
listening
Joined
Dec 2025
Subscription
Core

Admissions profile

LSAT
170
CAS GPA
3.85
1L START YEAR
2027

Applications

Berkeley
Intend to apply
Boston College
Intend to apply
Columbia
Intend to apply
Duke
Intend to apply
Fordham
Intend to apply
George Washington
Intend to apply
Harvard
Intend to apply
Loyola Marymount - LA
Intend to apply
Northwestern
Intend to apply
NYU
Intend to apply
Pepperdine
Intend to apply
Stanford
Intend to apply
UC - Davis
Intend to apply
UChicago
Intend to apply
UC - Irvine
Intend to apply
UCLA
Intend to apply
UC Law San Francisco
Intend to apply
UPenn
Intend to apply
USC
Intend to apply
USD
Intend to apply
USF
Intend to apply
Vanderbilt
Intend to apply
Yale
Intend to apply

Discussions

User Avatar
listening
12 hours ago

this is a template that a student previously shared online for others to use! i dont have the link to the original post but i used it extensively and I am sure at least one other 7sager has probably has used it too haha https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1SF1LOmsQjlj4avV-gYzKCIquFU5-LYVqUktVxKq0WuY/edit?gid=0#gid=0

1
PrepTests ·
PT147.S2.P2.Q14
User Avatar
listening
12 hours ago

next level ragebait

1
PrepTests ·
PT103.S1.Q23
User Avatar
listening
Friday, Oct 30

beast mode

1
PrepTests ·
PT113.S4.Q11
User Avatar
listening
Friday, Oct 30

@JJagalur if i understood ur question right, i feel like there r 2 aspects at play: 1) i feel like the most important clause that needs weakening galina's conclusion, which is "it must be something other than sugar." AC D, if true, makes it seem fairly likely the squirrels are going in for the sugar. also 2) i think by POE, AC D most effectively weakens her argument all around

1
User Avatar
listening
Thursday, Oct 22

@ps939 i would suggest looking through the phenomenon-hypothesis question tag and resolve reconcile explain tags! i feel like these r so helpful when it comes to thinking about ways an answer choice does or does not help whatever correlation is put forth in the stimulus

1
PrepTests ·
PT158.S1.P1.Q7
User Avatar
listening
Edited 12 hours ago

genuinely this passage is fascinating.. like woah

1
User Avatar
listening
Monday, Sep 21

Amazing!!!!!! Thank you guys!

2
PrepTests ·
PT159.S2.P4.Q24
User Avatar
listening
Monday, Sep 7

@IsabelTing11 girllll same lol... we got this tho!!

2
PrepTests ·
PT159.S2.P4.Q24
User Avatar
listening
Monday, Sep 7

@IsabelTing11 as in u used "exclu—" search to help u eliminate B-E bc they all mention exclusivity???? thats so smart

2
PrepTests ·
PT122.S4.Q18
User Avatar
listening
Thursday, Aug 13

@Makaveli678 I also got it wrong bc I thought D was beyond the scope of the stimulus! I think it really helps to recognize that this is a Sufficient Assumption question, meaning that the correct answer choice will 100% guarantee the truth of the conclusion. I.e., it's okay for the answer to be strong (or seem like it was not assumed). Like you said, I feel like it's so difficult/lowkey impossible to find the right answer without reminding yourself of the scope of how strong the correct answer can be

3
User Avatar
listening
Thursday, Aug 6

im revisiting this lesson after a few months... out of sheer curiosity, does anyone know of a specific LSAT question where some is used as all? im dying to see it irl

1

I would soooo appreciate it if we could turn off the "i" previous of why 7Sage flagged a question for Blind Review while still in the process of BR. I struggle soooo hard to resist the temptation to preview it, and see if I even got the question wrong. It can be helpful on drills and practice, but for a full PrepTest, I feel like it defeats the whole purpose of BR. For me at least!

2
User Avatar
listening
Saturday, May 23

@dh2303 Thank you so much, I appreciate your perspective and words of advice!

3
PrepTests ·
PT121.S3.P2.Q8
User Avatar
listening
Sunday, May 17

Can anyone explain why "achievement" in correct AC C is not unsupported by the passage? I chose E over C mainly on the basis the passage doesn't reference the male poets' achievements as being relevant. After review I understand why E is incorrect, just looking for more clarification on C!

1
User Avatar
listening
Saturday, May 16

thank you for believing in female consciousness

19
User Avatar
listening
Saturday, May 16

@dh2303 a few of your comments have been super helpful to me over the course of my prep, and you seem to have had a really strong mastery of the lsat since you first starting posting on 7sage!! can i ask if you did prior prep from outside sources, or if you have any other tips to share for increasing one's baseline grasp of materials? thanks in advance. :)

2
User Avatar
listening
Wednesday, May 13

@Kevin_Lin So exciting!! What is the YouTube channel name so I can keep an eye out?

1
User Avatar
listening
Monday, Apr 27

@MarcusTsang this is so helpful thank you! Can I ask what a wrong answer journal is? Do you do it for every question you get wrong, or only on PTs?

1
User Avatar
listening
Saturday, Apr 25

@CeciliaBurton1 lol can you enlighten me .. what is that

1
User Avatar
listening
Thursday, Mar 5

when doing full PT BR, is it recommended i do 7sage's "recommended for BR" questions in addition to the ones i flag?

2
User Avatar
listening
Saturday, Jan 24

in #3, can anyone help me understand why there is no predicate-object? I though it would be "black holes," but there is none identified in the answer

15
User Avatar
listening
Saturday, Jan 24

@KeziaH19 i have the same question!

1

Confirm action

Are you sure?