- Joined
- Dec 2025
- Subscription
- Core
Admissions profile
Discussions
question stem asks for an AC that "most accurately expresses a flaw in the reasoning in Peter's argument," but the 7Sage analysis of AC D says "This still accurately describes a flaw, even though there's another flaw the correct answer could have targeted."
If two ACs are accurate, how can one be more accurate than another? 🫠
@CherryMayDelaCruz Hi! Thank you for responding! As @AdamLaw said above, I'm looking to keep 7Sage BR recommendations flagged without the ability to preview why it was flagged while in BR.
I would soooo appreciate it if we could turn off the "i" previous of why 7Sage flagged a question for Blind Review while still in the process of BR. I struggle soooo hard to resist the temptation to preview it, and see if I even got the question wrong. It can be helpful on drills and practice, but for a full PrepTest, I feel like it defeats the whole purpose of BR. For me at least!
I go back and forth on this a lot! I think the main pro of BR is to help build your confidence in your decision-making abilities w/o any outside influence. Any other hints (e.g., peeking at your score before BR, reading the "i" circle for 7Sage recommended questions, etc.) ultimately can bias your approach to BR. I have a bad habit of peeking, which I'm trying to fix moving forward haha
As far as I can tell, you can't turn off the "i," but in Preferences, you could change the settings to only circle your flagged questions for BR?
@dh2303 Thank you so much, I appreciate your perspective and words of advice!
Can anyone explain why "achievement" in correct AC C is not unsupported by the passage? I chose E over C mainly on the basis the passage doesn't reference the male poets' achievements as being relevant. After review I understand why E is incorrect, just looking for more clarification on C!
@dh2303 a few of your comments have been super helpful to me over the course of my prep, and you seem to have had a really strong mastery of the lsat since you first starting posting on 7sage!! can i ask if you did prior prep from outside sources, or if you have any other tips to share for increasing one's baseline grasp of materials? thanks in advance. :)
does anyone have a list of other questions as hard as #13... I want to practice them all sdhfskdf
@Kevin_Lin So exciting!! What is the YouTube channel name so I can keep an eye out?
Do you have any questions to recommend an applicant ask themselves while brainstorming/drafting up their "why law" statements?
Should applicants tailor their personal statements to what they think a school is looking for? E.g., more cookie-cutter "why law" motivations for target/safety schools vs. more standout "why law" motivations for T14 schools?
Any insights on admissions officers' current views on discussion of diversity after the end of affirmative action? I've heard plenty of podcasts/articles from when the decision came out, but I'm wondering what some common sentiments are now that a few cycles have passed (i.e., if an applicant discusses their racial/ethnic background, should they make a whole essay about it? Is it frowned upon to mention it briefly where it fits in an essay?)
Should a law school resume be one page in the same way that a resume should be one page when applying for a job? When I apply, since undergrad, I'll have held ~2 years full time work experience, but a 1-year year gap filled with 3 part time positions (substitute teaching + interesting food service industry experience). 3 part time positions would hog precious space on a one page resume and is not as strong as my full time + undergrad experience, but it does show work ethic and accounts for a resume gap. Please advise — thanks!
@MarcusTsang this is so helpful thank you! Can I ask what a wrong answer journal is? Do you do it for every question you get wrong, or only on PTs?
when doing full PT BR, is it recommended i do 7sage's "recommended for BR" questions in addition to the ones i flag?
in #3, can anyone help me understand why there is no predicate-object? I though it would be "black holes," but there is none identified in the answer
im revisiting this lesson after a few months... out of sheer curiosity, does anyone know of a specific LSAT question where some is used as all? im dying to see it irl