I first chose D cause I looked at the alternative explanation which is peer pressure for why parent 2 disagrees with parent 1 on on why children are dating not dating at a youg age. I then changed my answer from D to B cause I looked at the word "refutes" in which parent 2 does he says "I disagree" I didn't really focus on the second part answer in B but I now that there is no "exception" being made to why something is the case.

I originally choice E . I understand why it is incorrect. If we negate by saying the potential of television as a powerful tool has been realized we would be going against education television is a contraction. We support why tv in in contradiction in term of educational setting. We supply evidence by telling the difference. I think negating helps I learned that I will be using that when in doubt.

Our argument depends on the assumption that the reason we are facing labor shortages is because of the requirement for people 65 or older to retire. If there is no restriction, then we will not be facing labor shortages.

If we negate our answer choice by sayin a large number of workers would NOT work past the age of 65 then this wreaks our argument because it depends on hat we would be facing labor shortages.

A) Skills or expertise is irrelevant to the argument. we are talking about labor shortages due to the requirement of retirement.

B) economic consequences is not a factor in our argument so eliminate.

D) Life expectancy is irrelevant. We don't care about when it was first initiated. We are concerned about labor shortages.

E) Officially retried? no actually engaged in working. Irrelevant to our argument.

I selected A to strengthen/ support the authors argument that by facing the dilemma we support by saying that the author developed two types vehicles. One for heavier for long distance if lighten vehicles are unsafe for long distance travel.

This is my logic.

DS→DIO

NOT NESCCSARY CONDITON DIO MEANS NOT DS (MEANS WE DONT HAVE A DEMOCARY THAT SURVIVES. IT IS THREATENED.

The way I see D is that because they already had high concentrations of galanin this caused them to crave fatting foods. his bridges are gap.

Our assumption high levels of G→F

Therefore G→F

In my reasoning I chose A because I through the French embassy included always included member of the clergy that because Bruno was a clergyman its supports that he was a spy.

E is correct cause it tells us that English records reflect his time of service at the French Embassy and that is why he is a spy. We connect evidence and conclusion to support that he was a spy.

I chose C. I thought " is not safer" implies no increase in safety.

I think a hint would be to look for "Current Medical Research shows" to the "Most Rational Public Health Strategy" which means its a transition from current policy to make a change to public health which is to put emphasis on informing people about the microorganism.

The word "Exclusively" should be a hint that only females produce GM62

Yes, this supports smiths argument the last premise that " We cannot give children the right to vote" supports such limitations on full democracy of denying children to vote," it should be accepted.

I chose C thinking the differences of diet is what has a impact. But C is incorrect because variance is irrelevant. We are trying to support that because the early humans had fewer dental problems is because healthy diet is significant to that. The reason why I did not choose E because of the word "most significant" i thought that we don't know if it was most significant.

It might help to think of this questions like that:

Lets look at the last sentence:

There is little reason to believe that there something badly wrong which means that the judges are qualified to decide upon the reasonableness of a government reasonable decision.

Good way to think of this. It tells us that Muscular strength is limited which means that superior mastery of techniques is needed. The clue is Muscular Strength is limited.

James: Educational needs is not the same is not true for universities of communities. The primary goal is different.

Margaret: The primary goal is to of any university is to serve the needs of community where it is located

On blind review I did not choose B because of the word "proficiently" I thought that we do not know if done proficiently. I orginally chose A. But I understand why incorrect. We do not know if they are being watched "closely"

At first I did not choose answer choice A because I thought that we do not know why employers utilize technology or a reason. But then looking closely It tells us that the technology became widely used because it was economically attractive.

I now understand why I got my answer incorrect. I originally chose answer choice E but then thinking that own conscious in ones own experience and that one or society thinks should be followed but should from ones own conscious. Incorrect.

C) We are saying the best way to proceed is by knowing what you are familiar with in this case its your child so it best to ignore the experts advice and follow what you are familiar with . The mountain climber example relates that a mountain climber knows what he is familiar with and to ignore someone who is an expert that is not familiar with that mountain. In other you know yourself better anyone else/you are familiar with your own situation/ child/ experience.

I got the answer correct but did not get the conditional correct. I was a little lost on chaining up the logic. I was almost close but took the longer was by doing this. L → /P contrapostive p →/L did not use the some←s→ relationship also i did the longer of saying R→/p contapostive p→/R . Again the did not knowing how to chain the conditional logic. I took forever on using the negative and contapostive when I can just be seeting up the logic without contapostive

I did not follow the conditional framework correctly . Also I think I need to write short hand conditional rather long because its take sooooo long . I started off ok. Where I put from 1950-1960 → R→ not S ( not suspension ) but did not put some statement correctly to diagram s→Faulty engineering design. I was close but did not quite sketch the conditional logic out

Ok. I will break this down of how I understood this. I first chose A because it said Alder proposed strict environment regulations and that Burke’s environmental policy coincided with the country Interests, therefore Alder seemed more committed to environmental policy or protecting the environment than Buke has . But now looking at answer choice A closely it’s says “throughout their respective careers of the country environmental measures “

We don’t have that information about their respective careers or how how long environmental has been around of taking measures . So A is wrong. C is correct because it’s seems that environmental issues over all issues mentioned carried a heavy weight for Alder’s election so it played an important role. Even though Buke offered a more effective strategies for dealing with “most” of the counties problems, but overall voters decided the environmental policy carried a heavier weight so that played an important role in the votes concerns so they chose Alder over Burke.

I kinda understand this argument now after going through my logical process. We are looking for a resolution for the dilemma.

What is the dilemma?

One one side we are presented with candidates spending as much as they want on political campaigns.

On the other side we are presented with democratic gov. presenting that a candidate spending as much as they want on a campaign gives them an unfair advantage over the rest.

What is a resolution resolution to prevent outspending?

We can out a limit on political campaign spending. Lets say the limit is $5,000 per candidates no candidate can spend more than other because of the limit.

I was kinda hesitant with between answer choice B and C. But I understand why C is not the answer. It is rejecting against what is presented in the stimulus that governments should not subsidize / give $ for expensive campaigns to each candidate.

I chose E because of the last sentence. Actually through process of elimination you can get to answer choice E. It says that histamines plays no role in the process by which colds produce no symptoms that a clue to paraphrase answer choice E

A, B, C, D.. are answers are not mentioned in stimulus. Being Effective. How do we know? Pollen and allergy not causing colds. How do we know? Also antihistamines when blocked causes drowsiness/ sleepiness so its is not effective that sleepiness can be effective at treating antihistamine.

E) yes correct. Any effect of antihistamines that may have at reducing cold symptoms it not through histamines because histamines plays no role in the processes in which cold symptoms does not play a role.

It’s takes more skill to play the banjo then to the guitar . If your the banjo then you also play the guitar.

If you play Guitar , it mean that can play banjo also.

I originally chose B because I thought that we must only monthly expenses is necessary for business to over expand and that critical for using cash flow statements? I did not really understand the premise/conclusion . I got tripped up by the word "only" thinking that businesses must only look at monthly expenses in order to benefit from cash flow statements. B is wrong because it is specifically talking about only businesses ( that has over expanded) that is the modifier. We have to support why the use of cash flow statements are critical to cover both monthly and non monthly expenses an

But here is why D is correct. It supports that why the use of cash-flow statements are critical and that is to cover the non -monthly expenses. That is the assumption we have to make to strengthen our argument.