I'm taking the LSAT this week, and I would just like to know when others are planning to do their writing sections. I'm trying to focus on the actual LSAT, but I can't help but feel like the writing section is looming over me. Are most people waiting to prepare and take the writing section after their August test date?
Which type of drilling mode for LR is the most accurate/ close to the actual LSAT? The options are:
1)7Sage Virtual Tutor picks
2) Particular tags
3) Tags and PrepTests
4) Incorrect when last taken (PrepTests)
5) Incorrect when last taken (Autobuilder)
Which option should I select? I usually do option one, but I feel like its practice sections always consist mainly of 3-4 question types. For example, I will generate a practice section with made up of mostly Flaw, Parallel, and Method of Reasoning, while no Sufficient Assumption, RRE, MSS, etc., appear at all. Is this what LR sections are like on actual LSATs?
As I've been taking practice LR sections, I've noticed that my range of wrong answers varies drastically. I don't struggle with any particular question type or difficulty level, so I'm not sure how to improve my score. For example, I will get like 8 questions wrong, each in a different category, ranging from 5/5 difficulty to 2/5 difficulty. Is it just a matter of practice? Please help! :)
I agree, I also chose E for the same reasons. I ruled out B because the stimulus already claimed that the same signal elicits different responses. Personally just gonna chalk this up to it being an older practice test and moving on.
Is there a list of types of reasoning we should expect in this section? Like past-future, part-to-whole, etc. #feedback
Is there a list of all the types of argument flaws that were covered in this section? #feedback #help
should we be able to get the hardest difficulty all correct at this point in the course? i still cant get anything labeled "very high" correct, and idk if i should be worried about this. #feedback #help
I don't think so, since answer choice A mentions "habitats" and hot spots are a kind of habitat. Personally, I decided against A because of the word "only," which is really strong. I hope this helps!
for #10, could we combine the claims by saying "((residents ←s→ /aware) hp-coffee —m→ 5mins+). or does this complicate things? #help#feedback
could we translate this to Lawgic to "there exists at least one student in Ms. Stoops' class who can read" instead? seems more intuitive #help#feedback
idk if it's just me, but the variables in these lessons make the concepts so much harder to grasp. Instead of "OpNo and 3+Ms → R," something simpler to read like "P and Q → R" would be a lot easier. #feedback
could we have answered #2 by using the disjunction and conjunction instead of the conditional? #help#feedback
I'm confused on how 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4 would be considered conditional statements. For example in 8.2, yes there is a relationship between digital books vs. non-digital books, and it makes a claim about their relationship, but there is nothing conditional about that statement. No condition is being met. #help #feedback
If I'm having trouble with SA questions, which logic lessons should I go back to? There are a lot of foundational logic lessons, so if someone can point out which ones would be the most helpful for sufficient/ necessary assumption questions, I'd appreciate it #feedback