another disagreement with using custom illustrations is that they can be fabricated to strengthen a litigants weak case, but author disagrees with this take and say there would be an expert testimony that would be able to testify to its accuracy.
(2) identify different perspectives
We have another line of disagreement along with the authors own argument towards this
(3) predict the direction of the next paragraph
I predict we will be given a deeper insight into the authors argument
#feedback is the low-res summary just buzzwords? I know the low-res summary is to help me remember what the paragraph is about, but I struggle with just keeping it to a word or a few words. Any strategy?
in the intro section where the author is speaking, we get a hint at what we see at the end of this paragraph. the author says the debate has misinformation. to me that hinted to the authors opinion. and sure enough we see that in this last part of the paragraph where the author does address misinformation. just a reminder to me, whenever the author is speaking to pay strong attention.
Wouldn't using x-rays or scanning images be the most accurate way to determine someone's injuries? Or would that go against HIPPA laws to be used in court?
Do you recommend marking the passage on the real test or the practice tests? For example, mark where the internal breaks occur using the highlighter option, or highlight key words or mark the location of the different opinions in different colors.
0
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
14 comments
(1) make a low-resolution summary
another disagreement with using custom illustrations is that they can be fabricated to strengthen a litigants weak case, but author disagrees with this take and say there would be an expert testimony that would be able to testify to its accuracy.
(2) identify different perspectives
We have another line of disagreement along with the authors own argument towards this
(3) predict the direction of the next paragraph
I predict we will be given a deeper insight into the authors argument
One Piece mentioned 4:09
#feedback There is a typo in the subtitles at 2:07. It says "Laja" instead of "LawHub."
Oh we are gonna do big things together on this test.
lets goo.
#feedback is the low-res summary just buzzwords? I know the low-res summary is to help me remember what the paragraph is about, but I struggle with just keeping it to a word or a few words. Any strategy?
in the intro section where the author is speaking, we get a hint at what we see at the end of this paragraph. the author says the debate has misinformation. to me that hinted to the authors opinion. and sure enough we see that in this last part of the paragraph where the author does address misinformation. just a reminder to me, whenever the author is speaking to pay strong attention.
Wouldn't using x-rays or scanning images be the most accurate way to determine someone's injuries? Or would that go against HIPPA laws to be used in court?
Do you recommend marking the passage on the real test or the practice tests? For example, mark where the internal breaks occur using the highlighter option, or highlight key words or mark the location of the different opinions in different colors.