- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Chopin is not like the other girls. But she is a little
This lesson has taught me that I am going to enter law school with the maturity of a third grader.
oh
Same lol. I always got the MP questions wrong and felt stupid. I feel hope now haha
This referential phrasing example is really helpful! This got me the first time I came across this passage.
Technologically humbled right now lmao
https://imgflip.com/i/8o5ni6
i girlbossed gaslit gatekept this question
omg no way me 2 #slé
I sometimes forget halfway through the answer choices that we're dealing with an EXCEPT question and pick the wrong answer because it works. RIP
Not sure if this helps but I think it is because if we accept B to be true then it is impossible that we could have the results of the recent increased use of sunscreen. In other words we would not see the effectiveness of this increase in sunscreen use until the young people who used this sunscreen during this period of time are much older.
I think it's because it says they are assigned or that they "are to work together." To me this seems that they are not given the option in these cases.
Good for Pat. Love this for Pat.
I listened back after commenting and you're right about JY's pronunciation being incorrect. People say his name differently for all the reasons you listed. It's most likely JY said it incorrectly because his name is commonly, and correctly, pronounced in a variety of ways. Congrats on your accomplished language skills though!
It's actually not pronounced like "handle." Händel was German, so he used the correct pronunciation.
I'm with you on this one.
Oh duh!! Thanks for your help!!
I think it's because there can be a decline ONLY if politicians become corrupt. So if they don't become corrupt then there is no other possible reason for the decline based on the stimulus. Hope this helps!
Hi Taylor! Not sure if this helps but I think I you may be confusing the sufficient condition for the necessary condition in your contrapositive. /ED --> /YT is just saying that not having extraordinary discipline is sufficient for not having years of training. But it does not mean that if you do not have years of training that you do not have extraordinary discipline.
What helped me on this problem was finding a parallel situation:
Having a university degree requires attending college. Attending college requires getting accepted into college. Getting accepted to college requires one to have a good GPA. So we know that it's necessary for one to have a good GPA to go to college. But one could not be accepted to college and have a good GPA. In other words it is necessary to have a good GPA to go to college but not getting into college doesn't mean one does not have a good GPA. It is a possible reason for one to not get into college but there could be another reason, making it sufficient but not necessary. Maybe they had a shit personal statement.
All we know from the original stimulus is that Tom does not have years of training, which is necessary for The Force, but it does not mean that he does not possess extraordinary discipline. Not having years of training is sufficient for believing that Tom doesn't have extraordinary discipline but we cannot know that for sure based on the information provided in the stimulus. Maybe he has extraordinary discipline in arts and crafts!
The "only" in problem 3 made a fooooool of me
No, it takes me longer just because of typing, but I'm doing them all to practice memorizing and also get used to typing more.
Oh she is NOT like the other girls