This is the dumbest question I have ever come across

I am stuck on why C is wrong. The difference between AC A and C is that they are two different assumptions.

A- you have to assume honking= more pressure = more time

C- you have to assume the honking driver = closer driver = more time

What is the difference between the two assumptions that makes A right? From my understanding, the AC with the least assumptions and most reasonable of the two is the Correct answer. Why is A more reasonable than C?

#feedback #help

For Q5, I thought "no" means negate Necessary. So i translated it as C-> /fray and snap. Why does the "no" translation not apply here. #help #admin

If we negate AC A so "the proposed theory does not apply," it does not necessarily mean the prescription of needing to raise tuition to increase the application poll is destroyed (as in it passes the negation test) . What if another alternative hypothesis (since the proposed theory does not apply) with its own reasoning had the solution to increase tuition, therefore having the same conclusion as the argument? Wouldn't that make AC A not necessary?

This is what I thought when doing this AC. Did I overthink the question? Please help. #feedback #help

I ended up picking E out of frustration, but that was only because I had eliminated everything else.