slayed this question, thank you JY!

Should I try out the mini drills here under time pressure and then BR and take the time I want? Or do it untimed all together?

I did this as well during blink review!

Cooked during blind review!

To help me with questions like these, if I see that the premise is followed by a sufficient indicator, I immediately skip the question, mark it wrong and move on. Like in question D.

It would not be because you would be mistaking sufficiency for necessity! So in other words putting the conclusion first and the premise second! I could be wrong though!

I do!

These are useful for LR!

For number 7, could you also put 10 plus years into the domain and just write shelter ----> supported?

#help (Added by Admin)

I could be wrong, but I am assuming that what the domain is, is a way for you to focus on the argument that matters the most. In the example that was used, there are four sufficient conditions that trigger the necessary condition. NYC was put up in the domain, because for the rule to apply, it has to be assumed that the person lives in New York. When you put it all together, it is just a way to compartmentalize and focus on the sufficient conditions that truly matters and make things a bit more easier!

I believe that it is a conditional because of the use of the word "must be." I feel like if you use the word "are" if might make it seem more normative, at least to me. I am not sure if this helps! For me, I try to see it as when we look at two things, if something must, needs, or has to happen then I automatically put it as a necessary condition.

I also agree, I had a hard time digesting contrapositives and conditional statements but the more you let it sit with you the easiest it becomes

Do you suggest that we make flashcardsof indicators?

#help (Added by Admin)

Will there be a video explanation of the answers?