- Joined
- Jan 2026
- Subscription
- Core
Admissions profile
Discussions
We're given: The Ridge fire is lit. Rule 3 states "If the Mill fire is lit, the Well fire or the Ridge fire is lit"
- Since it's an "or" statement, only one of the conditions (Well or Ridge fires being lit) need to occur. The Ridge fire is lit, so why would we not be able to tell that the Mill is lit or unlit?
Thanks!
Struggled with SA and NA questions. Decided to read about the questions on LSATDemon. Came back immediately after reading and got this right
#feedback been seeing people request this since 2023, but please give us a preview of the stim, question, and answer choices before the video. I'd like to attempt to answer the question before diving into the explanation
5/5 after being so nervous because I took a day off from studying. Wahooooo. Do not pressure yourself into studying when you're burnt out.
What helped me understand is any argument where "all" precedes "some" or "most" will never yield a valid conclusion. "All" must always follow either "some" or "most".
@MarkDossey
We know something happened if: [VALID ARGUMENTS]
the sufficient condition is affirmed
the necessary condition is denied
We do NOT know something happened if: [INVALID ARGUMENTS]
the sufficient condition is denied
the necessary condition is affirmed
5/5, but I don't feel that happy since the difficulty of the Qs I got were not rated as super difficult ://
Others think that Spider-Man is dangerous due to his vigilante status. However, Spider-Man’s presence has been beneficial for New York. After all, since his debut, crimes rates has been significantly reduced.
Idk why I am so irked about a question that was removed from scoring being counted as an Incorrect answer lol