4/5. I missed #2, the easiest question on here but I am STILL confused. I immediately crossed out the right answer on #2. That was because it assumes that a change in chemical amount will have a different effect. How does it weaken the argument if it's not even confirmed???? Just because there is more chemical in glass A vs glass B, that does not necessarily mean anything at all. Maybe you just need even a dash of chemical to get the same exact prescription reaction. And that same reaction happens if you have two fold of the chemical. Somebody help please!! It's a 97% gets it right question, I aced the difficult ones but i'm stumped here for some reason
I got a 5/5 and was about to do BR, but I felt so confident in my answer choices that I trusted my gut and kept my answers the same!! This is my 1st 5/5, I'm so proud of myself.
I thought I got fluent in Lawgic, diagramng, translation, and valid arguemtns and this was supposed to be a drill for that but defintley not helpful at all. The questions are a lot more complicated and it feels like the conditional logic don't get used the same way. In fact, I think trying to force using conditional logic made me miss the obvious answers and problems with the question.
Didn't expect the Foundations module to be as helpful as it turned out to be, but after applying its strategies, I scored 5/5 on my first attempt. AND I only felt uncertain about one question!
Does anyone notice that they are doing better when they give themselves less time to think about the question? For me personally on the first try I got 2/5 where I averaged over a 1:30-2 on each question. On my retake with similar difficulty questions I got 5/5 while averaging under a minute each question.
@caimckeever keep pushing. One thing I’ve started to do before/after completing a module is reviewing my notes! Also studying some of the diagrams have helped me too
70 comments
I have to stop second guessing myself
4/5. I missed #2, the easiest question on here but I am STILL confused. I immediately crossed out the right answer on #2. That was because it assumes that a change in chemical amount will have a different effect. How does it weaken the argument if it's not even confirmed???? Just because there is more chemical in glass A vs glass B, that does not necessarily mean anything at all. Maybe you just need even a dash of chemical to get the same exact prescription reaction. And that same reaction happens if you have two fold of the chemical. Somebody help please!! It's a 97% gets it right question, I aced the difficult ones but i'm stumped here for some reason
5/5 but at what cost bc i spent 5 min on a level 1 question.. atp am i getting a 165 or a 139...
4/5 The producer question got me
4/5!! I might actually be making some progress.
are all of these questions informal logic?
@tcbc59 yeah i wasn't really able to apply lawgic very well here either
3/5 initially then 5/5 on blind review. my constant issue is that i keep double guessing myself
4/5. I chose the right answer at first and then changed it...sigh
4/5! could have had a full sweep but I didn't trust my gut lolz
I got a 5/5 and was about to do BR, but I felt so confident in my answer choices that I trusted my gut and kept my answers the same!! This is my 1st 5/5, I'm so proud of myself.
5/5 first T had me hypeddddd
5/5 first try omg!!
5/5 on the first try! Timing could have been way better but practice makes progress.
I thought I got fluent in Lawgic, diagramng, translation, and valid arguemtns and this was supposed to be a drill for that but defintley not helpful at all. The questions are a lot more complicated and it feels like the conditional logic don't get used the same way. In fact, I think trying to force using conditional logic made me miss the obvious answers and problems with the question.
@Shwani this is mixed practice not all the questions are about conditional logic
4/5. getting more comfortable taking my time with these 5 question sets.
4/5 - i cant believe i got number 5 wrong out of all of them
4/5 on the first try BUT my issue is im still taking 3-6 minutes on each question. its still early so im praying i get faster!
Didn't expect the Foundations module to be as helpful as it turned out to be, but after applying its strategies, I scored 5/5 on my first attempt. AND I only felt uncertain about one question!
Does anyone notice that they are doing better when they give themselves less time to think about the question? For me personally on the first try I got 2/5 where I averaged over a 1:30-2 on each question. On my retake with similar difficulty questions I got 5/5 while averaging under a minute each question.
2/5 on both tries and then seeing the comments is extremely discouraging. maybe this test isn’t for me.
@caimckeever keep pushing. One thing I’ve started to do before/after completing a module is reviewing my notes! Also studying some of the diagrams have helped me too
3/5 & then 5/5, sometimes you just gotta trust your gut
4/5 then 5/5 BR. The A comparative for number 4 got me!
3/5 then BR 4/5. Question 2 killed me.
4/5, then 5/5 blind review!
3/5! Consistently getting 3/5.