@SophieBaker :((

why would the author refer to themselves as they? Wouldn’t these use I, or people like myself etc?

"obtain" basically was a synonym for "hold true" in this question.

"sufficient to cover the cost of purchasing and installing those generators"

what if they have a source of money that could cover the cost of the generators. why does the money saved on electricity have to be enough to buy generators. they business probably saves money thru alternative means that could be used to buy them generators.

negate A and the argument instantly falls apart.

same

how would the negation of d look like?

its because the harm of self-diagnosis comes from non scientifically valid info.

if they use scientific info they good.

if use non scientific info, bad.

3/5 regular then 5/5 blind review yayyyy

if harming health (HARM HEALTH=CANT EVER BE HAPPY) then u CANTTTT keep making money.

assume this--->

A) Money should be acquired only if its acquisition will not make happiness unobtainable.

A) basically translates to

go ahead and make money if it wont make happiness unobtainable.

I replaced happiness unobtainable w/ harm health

idk if that makes yall more confused

extra 9 seconds :((

basically look for something that DISQUALIFIES Penn from even being considered for the award (no good record)

The manager isn't arguing about benefiting the company, though. He only cares about the current product based on the passage... maybe when he's talking about guaranteeing success, he's talking about the success of the company and not the product right?