@SophieBaker :((

why would the author refer to themselves as they? Wouldn’t these use I, or people like myself etc?

habataitara modoranaii to itte idk why i commented ts

b4 reading the explanation: wait theres...a flaw???...

Fudge ☹️

"obtain" basically was a synonym for "hold true" in this question.

if only the whole lr was ts question type

"sufficient to cover the cost of purchasing and installing those generators"

nahh what if they have a source of money that could cover the cost of the generators. why does the money saved on electricity have to be enough to buy generators. they business probably saves money thru alternative means that could be used to buy them generators.

negate A and the argument instantly falls apart.

same

how would the negation of d look like?

its because the harm of self-diagnosis comes from non scientifically valid info.

if they use scientific info they good.

if use non scientific info, bad.

yayyy!

3/5 regular then 5/5 blind review yayyyy

ayy 23 seconds

the less i think the better i do

genuinely guessed in 50 seconds

if harming health (HARM HEALTH=CANT EVER BE HAPPY) then u CANTTTT keep making money.

assume this--->

A) Money should be acquired only if its acquisition will not make happiness unobtainable.

A) basically translates to

go ahead and make money if it wont make happiness unobtainable.

I replaced happiness unobtainable w/ harm health

idk if that makes yall more confused

this question difficulty is proof aliens arent real

extra 9 seconds :((

@KeiraSinger SAMEEE BROUGHHH. PERFECT TIMING ON THESE TOO.

basically look for something that DISQUALIFIES Penn from even being considered for the award (no good record)

yall ever read the word wrong? I read likely as unlikely 🤦🏼‍♀️

son im crine ts was the easiest question ever I immediately read it and was like: who said anything about progress being hindered by fraud?

The manager isn't arguing about benefiting the company, though. He only cares about the current product based on the passage... maybe when he's talking about guaranteeing success, he's talking about the success of the company and not the product right?