@adwaitghotikar151 Seriously. This is absurd

@MRod same. I thought it was Threatening -> Horrific and that messed me up. I can't wrap my head around why it's the other way around

I think much of the confusion expressed in the comments is from misunderstanding/glossing over the referential "to," which refers to "some cultivars of corn are much more closely related morphologically." The video glosses over that importance as well. If it had said "than are most other cultivars" then the comparison "some corn" vs "other corn" would be the logically correct one, which understandably is what a lot of us thought

@dh2303 Thank you for pointing this out, I was a bit confused about this as well and I hope others can offer additonal insight into this

@KevinLin so even if one of the premises is a restatement of a different author's claims-- as long as the author themselves is making the conclusion, we can call it an argument?