this one messed me up, I can't think in generalizations that well.

But doesn't E still consider Algae and the small fish, but you just flip the causal logic? Or am I interpreting this wrong?

i keep getting 3/5, im so upsettt

what level do you guys do? I do medium usually because it has a mix of both easy and hard which is representative of the LSAT, but I'm curious if its worth drilling hard because I still have much material to cover and don't want to be stuck drilling only hard questions.

this is hurting my ego a little ngl.

cool, I'm interested as well!

does "solely" not make a necessary assumption?

finally got 4/5 after consistently getting 2/5. I'm going to take that as a win.

But wouldn't an actor IN hamlet still be aware of all the other parts and possess some accuracy? It doesn't make sense to me that the answer is C?

Okay wait, I think i get it now. A is right because those who do not abandon cars cannot be caught to be convicted of a crime?

these questions are not clicking for me. I chose E because it explains the phenomenon on why convictions are rising; it explains the causal relationship. A does not? Maybe I'm missing something when I do these questions but wow these are hard.

picked B so confidently too...

I wonder if these are considered hard questions for the lsat? I feel like these questions are relatively easier than the ones on the PT