I was tricked by A as it says the last three months lol I thought it was saying from July to September

That’s what made me wrong in this question…

Everyday chores cannot have aesthetic senses? Do they conflict?

#help (added by Admin)

Can I still join?? Thanks!

The conclusion says "these monkeys are not complete captive of their genetic heritage." --- let's see it as 90%.

D says "these monkeys are completely independent of heir genetic heritage." --- 100%

D conflicts with the conclusion

E is wrong because we don't know if a "new, improved" pkg will help the product sell better. We only know that the pkg could satisfy consumers' expectations. Also "success" is not just being able to "sell more."

We don't know the definition of "success" here.

The stimulus can be simplified to two claims:

1) people with back muscle injuries receive two forms of treatments: (drugs and physical therapy) or (only physical therapy);

2) drugs are necessary to people who receive drugs.

The question is to find an answer to reconcile the two claims.

A gives an extra explanation on patients with "serious back muscle injuries." -- it's irrelevant.

B sounds right to me because it tells me why 1) and 2) are there together and explains the situation.

C touches on the first claim of the stimulus and does not offer any explanations on the second part of the stimulus so it does not help reconcile.

D is wrong because it's an irrelevant imagination we don't know.

E is on other things which don't help reconcile.

Chose A because I thought early 18th century is irrelevant to 1750 - 1765...

D can eliminate the uncertainty of the "if" condition in the stimulus and make it become one more condition that helps the operation of repertory theater.

My understanding is that even though some stations have been used for more than 60 years it doesn't mean that they are primitive. They could be also modern as well.

This is what I thought as well. #help

What if there's a policy forcing everyone to have a gap year before they apply for schools? Then everyone when they apply would be older

I graduated from McGill and am now working in a US company. I do feel that McGill has a very good fame in the states, at least in the NY/DC areas. I got my current job partly because of the school's name...

Montreal has tons of opportunities where you get to study and practice international law. Had wonderful four years at McGill and miss the French environment much.. If not because of my limited French skills, I would def go back to McGill for law school.

UBC is for sure a good school too, but I don't have any idea how the school would be a better place for international law. Think location means a lot if you have preferences of what to practice.

Isn't B saying something of the past? How we can use the past experience to ascertain what will happen in the future?

#help (Added by Admin)

D was giving me a hard time as it only partially mentioned one of the two points in the stimulus... Thought I had to pick an answer that fully addresses the flaws of of the question.. #feedback

Chose B reluctantly just because the other four ACs are so off.

Finally understood after pondering the question for a while. Just wonder how I can be more incisive to pick up the correct AC during the test. Gotta practice more i think..

Interested! thanks!

same here. yikes. I just sent the admin a question over this prob. thought i was the only one..

Could someone help elaborate the difference between being sentimental and being emotional? #help (Added by Admin)

If the question turns to be: "The argument is wrong is bc the reason process the stimulus used is..." I guess it would be must easier... ugh

Interested! Appreciate if the group is formed!

Hi - I'm interested in this!

About to turn 28. Quitted my job last November for LSAT. Life is long!