User Avatar
suhyahn
Joined
Jan 2026
Subscription
Core

Admissions profile

LSAT
Not provided Goal score: 180
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
2027

Discussions

Study Groups · Non-traditional Students Group
User Avatar
suhyahn
Tuesday, Apr 14

There's r/LawSchoolOver30. Even if you're not literally over 30, if you've been working for 5+ years, I think you'd find the subreddit relatable.

5
General · Is a career change at 30 feasible
User Avatar
suhyahn
Sunday, Apr 12

Ofc. I'm 32 and applying for a college. I already changed my career once (was in military), and I don't feel old. "Almost 30 years" isn't old at all.

1
PrepTests ·
PT111.S3.Q22
User Avatar
suhyahn
Sunday, Mar 29

@Kevin_Lin Yeah, somehow I overlooked "required." It's too obvious when you don't overlook it. Duh.

1
Lessons · You Try - Premature Births
User Avatar
suhyahn
Sunday, Mar 22

@Mitch91 That worked for this question, but that's not a logically accurate. If you're going to include likeliness in a symbol, then a condition that doesn't dictate likeliness should be a different symbol. In other words, "likely-B" and "B" denote two different conditions, so if you're going to write likely-B as "Y," then "B" should be "Z."

Therefore, an accurate way to symbolize this argument while including "likely" in a symbol would be A --> B. ~C. Therefore, ~D. This argument is flawed because the premises tell us nothing about the conclusion.

Your symbolization worked by coincidence, and logic in LSAT (especially this one) is a rudimentary one, so that helped. But you can't treat "likely-B" and "not B" as Y and ~Y.

Just five cents because I specialized in analytic philosophy (which means dealing with these types of symbols a lot) on a graduate level.

2
Lessons · Skill Builder - Distinguishing Sufficient v. Necessary Assumption Question Stems
User Avatar
suhyahn
Saturday, Mar 21

Then how is "Which one of the following is an assumption the argument requires in order for its conclusion to be properly drawn?" from PT111.S3.Q22 (rattlesnake) Necessary Assumption? Its question stem is a classic Sufficient Assumption, according to this drill. But when you hit Analytics for that question, it says it's NA, not SA. Any answers would be appreciated.

1
PrepTests ·
PT111.S3.Q22
User Avatar
suhyahn
Saturday, Mar 21

The question is "...an assumption the argument requires in order for its conclusion to be properly drawn?" A question that asks what's required in the argument to back up conclusion is a sufficient assumption question. So how is this necessary assumption question? Every single question stem in this format is identified as a sufficient assumption question in "Skill Builder - Distinguishing Sufficient v. Necessary Assumption Question Stems."

1
Lessons · You Try - Joggers and Stretching (W)
User Avatar
suhyahn
Sunday, Mar 1

@ArdenAmarelo And my philosophy background helped me with this.

2
General · Anyone experiencing the same glitch on the Sections/Drills?
User Avatar
suhyahn
Sunday, Feb 22

@AgnesAlojado Got your email. I was already using Chrome. I'll see what happens when I take the next drill and let you know if I have any problems.

1

When I’m working on a section, all of the question numbers are marked dark green at the bottom of the page, indicating I answered all of the questions. But when I submit it, it says I haven’t answered one or two questions. The same happened with an RC drill. I submitted a drill after checking everything’s marked, and then it said I omitted an answer for one question. I marked it again in the blind review, but my answer wasn’t registered again, showing that I didn’t answer the question for both drill and blind review. 

This never happened to me until today. Anyone experiencing the same problem today?

1
Lessons · Lesson 3 - Job Loss
User Avatar
suhyahn
Edited Saturday, Feb 21

Can you show all the answer choices without marking right or wrong first, and then start to go over them one by one? I prefer trying to solve it myself before I see the explanation, and you showing just A and saying that it's the right choice makes it hard to do it.

3
PrepTests ·
PT152.S2.Q23
User Avatar
suhyahn
Saturday, Feb 14

I understand why A is right, but I don't understand why D is wrong. To say you recognize someone by appearance is to say you recognize someone regardless of places and circumstances, i.e., purely by their appearance. If I recognize someone who assaulted me, I'd recognize him or her not just at a place of assault but anywhere: in front of my house, in the train, at an airport, etc. If I don't recognize the person who assaulted me when I'm no longer at the place of assault, can I really say that I recognize the assaulter? It seems like recognizing caveman masks anywhere--not just where they were captured but also in other places--seems to be a requirement for "recognizing threatening people."

1

Confirm action

Are you sure?