I knew E was not a good answer, but I did not think B was much better. E actually explains why more Iron. Whereas B... not sure what it does. I mean in hindsight I get it.. but seems like a weak argument.

"Because we are not going to consider the 5 calories of carnalized sugar, raisin have more iron per calorie".. this is no bueno to me. I was hoping for something that flat out explained why there was more iron. I guess a 4 or 5 star question will not usually give that kind of answer.

I got it correct doing a combination of looking at the argument format and having a loose idea of the logic. Spent 1min.

I have officially decided to what we in the military call "Charlie out" on these question types. Aka I am going to put C and save my brain.

I am leaving a reply because it seems no one else has. This has helped me a bit. Normally, I look at formatting, topic, etc. So much more than what I need, and should be looking at.

I should of known when it used "repudiates" it was the correct answer.

This is the kind of arguments my soon to be ex wife makes. Stay single my fellow LSAT peeps.

Philosophy has slightly helped me here. This is the fallacy of ad hominen I believe.

Did not even realize it was RRE. Explains why I got it correct easily.

I am torn between skipping these lvl 5s and spending immense amount of time to MAYBE get them.

Need more like this to boost my confidence.

Why cant this just be it? 3 hour test of questions like this lol.

I paused the video and then some other guy started talking freaking me out. Finally I realized there is another video below the main video.

These last few are just terrible.

Got it wrong. Had it narrowed down to A and E chose E. I went with E because I felt like "eliminating may also have negative.." was too ambiguous. I knew the flaw was just because you eliminated something, does not mean the best result will occur. Which is what I thought E took care of. Time to watch the video (walk of shame)

I got it correct.. bit of a leap, but it was the best of the worst IMO. When I hit submit I said "that is a hard question"

I chose B over C and cannot really see why one is better than the other. Time to watch the 17minute long video. Yay.

1:06 crushed it. I cannot miss.

The other answers seemed so bad, I did not even really consider them. Perhaps, my knowledge is lacking? If so, it seems to be a strength at the moment.

"illicitly infers a cause from a correlation"

Someone once said in the comments if its a random word, that is the correct answer. This was my first shot trying it (It also sounded like a good answer) and got it correct.

Yay! I do not even care that it was a 1 star and 98% of us got it correct. Just happy to be apart of the 98%.

Why is this section 12 hours? Alv

4/5 on medium. Missed a 4 star. Ill take it. Took 8-10mins. On to the next.

I am getting these right, but feel like I could easily get them wrong. This felt like a 4 star. I had it narrowed down to A and B. Decided on B after 4 minutes. Ended up deciding against A, because the critic actually attacks damn near everything about the argument. So it stating only 1 premise did not seem good enough.

These questions to me are just good old fashion reading comprehension. How well does the answer summarize the argument. Your ability to pinpoint is just reading comprehension IMO.

I still have faith in all of you even if you're getting these wrong.

I got it right quickly, but not confident. I was fully ready to watch multiple videos explaining it.

I miss identified the conclusion. Yay!