Thank you! I do Jiujitsu and I have a group of friends there and we created it.

I got this one wrong could not really understand how C made sense. Read your comment, looked at the stim again and it made perfect sense. Going to try it out on more MBT and if it works... bless you sweet child.

You cant tell the difficulty of a problem by reading them?

I knew E was not a good answer, but I did not think B was much better. E actually explains why more Iron. Whereas B... not sure what it does. I mean in hindsight I get it.. but seems like a weak argument.

"Because we are not going to consider the 5 calories of carnalized sugar, raisin have more iron per calorie".. this is no bueno to me. I was hoping for something that flat out explained why there was more iron. I guess a 4 or 5 star question will not usually give that kind of answer.

I got it correct doing a combination of looking at the argument format and having a loose idea of the logic. Spent 1min.

I have officially decided to what we in the military call "Charlie out" on these question types. Aka I am going to put C and save my brain.

I am leaving a reply because it seems no one else has. This has helped me a bit. Normally, I look at formatting, topic, etc. So much more than what I need, and should be looking at.

I am just old :)

I should of known when it used "repudiates" it was the correct answer.

This is the kind of arguments my soon to be ex wife makes. Stay single my fellow LSAT peeps.

Philosophy has slightly helped me here. This is the fallacy of ad hominen I believe.

Did not even realize it was RRE. Explains why I got it correct easily.

I am torn between skipping these lvl 5s and spending immense amount of time to MAYBE get them.

Need more like this to boost my confidence.

Why cant this just be it? 3 hour test of questions like this lol.

He makes each one seem incredibly stupid. Example A says:" Peepee pooopooo, choose me!"

Because we are attacking the argument reasoning. The argument says 97% opposed high taxes. Then it says because of this, they would support a reduction in income tax.

Well what information would we need to make this decision? Whether or not they think the rate is high.

The correct answer is short, and sweet. The others are worded terrible to confuse you and end up not even mattering.

I think not E because it never specifies a better opportunity for being the decider. Instead, it merely states right now is definitely not good.

I paused the video and then some other guy started talking freaking me out. Finally I realized there is another video below the main video.

These last few are just terrible.

E was enticing but I looked at it as requiring another assumption. We would have to assume it was not a complete list AND it was done on purpose. Versus the correct answer where we just assume it was not a complete list.

Edgar has gotten me through a lot over the years.

Ah okay, I got it now.

Got it wrong. Had it narrowed down to A and E chose E. I went with E because I felt like "eliminating may also have negative.." was too ambiguous. I knew the flaw was just because you eliminated something, does not mean the best result will occur. Which is what I thought E took care of. Time to watch the video (walk of shame)

I got it correct.. bit of a leap, but it was the best of the worst IMO. When I hit submit I said "that is a hard question"