- Joined
- Apr 2026
- Subscription
- Core
Admissions profile
Discussions
bruh every time i log on it's different. now there's gaps in passages and words remain highlighted when using ctrlF again (they literally removed it a couple weeks ago just to bring it back lmao wtf)
This is stupid. There's nothing that says the store owner hadn't already ordered the lights by the time they had the convo w a friend - vandalism had been going on for 6 months by that point. So why is B not possible? Its asking us to assume something when we're quite literally told not to do that the entire test
This question feels like a giant middle finger to everything we've been taught to pay attention to. Since when does the word significant not matter? We're just gonna ignore the possibility that the spent fuel rods could still contain some quantity (albeit a small one) of tellurium isotopes? Also, I guess we're just assuming that the quantity of isotopes must be significant in order to be detected... even though we're told not to make assumptions like that...
Also, the usage of the word 'dissolve' here is ridiculous. Merriam Webster defines it: to cause to disperse or disappear: destroy. Scientifically, it's defined as the process where a solid, liquid, or gas (the solute) breaks down into tiny particles and mixes evenly into a solvent, forming a solution. They're assuming everyone will default to using the hyper-specific scientific version???
C's usage of 'counterexample' makes 0 sense to me. Doesn't a counterexample imply that there was a different, original example presented, to which we are now countering? If there's only one example used (the moose thing), isn't it just an example?????
This is some BS, how does C make sense when it says 'geology of the oceans' and not ocean FLOOR? The passage literally begins by emphasizing discoveries about geology of OCEAN FLOOR
@QuincyMacShane Me too! I don't understand why they say B is unsupported. #help
In an 'if___, then __' statement, would it be correct to say that the sufficient condition is always after the 'if', and necessary is after the 'then'?
@ColinErickson Literally about to cry over how useful these are/how much time this is gonna save me, THANK U
didn't choose A cause I thought it was a mishmash answer, it was so poorly worded. wtf? 'did not obtain'?
Was breezing thru these sections till I got to NA. Literally haven't gotten a single one correct ffs
@Kevin_Lin So, whether one says 'condition' or 'assumption' depends on the structure of the argument? I understand sufficiency vs. necessity overall, but don't get that distinction (and does that really matter on the test, or is it semantics as long as you get the idea)
I started studying for the LSAT around a month ago, and plan to take the September test. I've finished the Foundations unit and am more than halfway through the LR unit - so, I'm wondering when I should start incorporating drilling and PTs into my studying, and how often? I haven't been doing drills asides from ones built in to the lessons, and haven't done a PT since my diagnostic.
@miladplays #feedback this (examples under each type) needs to be integrated into the lesson!! The links are frustrating as it takes us to new pages and then I have to come back to this lesson each time I'm done reading the example. I don't want to click back/forth.
bruh I thought A was a trap answer because it was too obvious/basically stated word for word
I understand how to 'convert/translate' these sentences and am getting them correct, but I feel like I'm not really understanding the purpose or deeper learning objectives behind all this. How will this help us on the test, in such a time-limited setting? What is the actual goal here? It'd be helpful if lessons told us explicitly how/when to use this on questions in the LSAT, how it's directly applicable, and maybe incorporated more relevant practice.
bro thinks we know what schadenfreude means