- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
Discussions
Missing all of them but this one so far has me thrown for a hell of a loop
When I answered this question, I actually stopped reading after that part because it meant that having a great record was the ONLY way to win. What that part is saying is that there is no other way to win other than having a great record. You can win the award with a great record, but not other wise (basically telling us that we need to look for the answer that clearly states one of them has the commendable record).
I hope this helped clear up the question!
After getting the last few wrong, nailing this one in my fastest time yet was very rewarding! Lightbulb finally clicked on
3/5, BUT I was debating the two answers I got wrong with the right ones the whole time. I will count this as a win this time
I was actually stunned to see how many people chose B, and that a 172 was the average to get this question right
I thought for the questions on the LSAT we should give up prior knowledge on subjects, and use only what the passage is telling us to get our answer? When looking at the opera signer passage, this would make the example's argument seem much more valid to me, using only the passage's information available. If someone could clarify why it was specified to forget prior information earlier, yet use our knowledge of actual opera singer numbers here to invalidate the argument, that would be a huge help. Or if a better explanation can be attached, please do.
I swear these last few lessons are just trying to confuse people who understood this section from the beginning
On the LSAT, your intuition will have to carry you; there is not enough time to formally solve every problem. I would say that training your intuition to know the right answers and feel comfortable answering as fast as possible is the most valuable tool, and if you are recognizing them now then you are even better off.