- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
#feedback I really liked how the previous question J.Y. was referencing was visually put into the video as he was talking about it and the parts he was talking about were highlighted. It would be really helpful if this was always done in videos where another question is referenced.
#feedback It would be nice to have a link to any past lessons or questions mentioned in this lesson so we can go back and review them after they are discussed here as being important background info for understanding the current concept.
I would love to have a high resolution summary written at the end of each of these lessons, like what is on the lessons about formal logic and grammar. Something to the effect of, "when a question is comparing numbers, don't forget that percentages of numbers doesn't equal absolute numbers." Or something like that... just a broader application principle that we learn from each lesson. I think that would help me apply the knowledge from each lesson more broadly, and give something for me to take notes on to review the main takeaways from each bite sized lesson.
Question 4: Does the word "whenever" usually indicate a sufficient condition? To me, it seemed more aligned with a group 2 necessary indicator word because it seems to indicate "only when." #help
These would be more helpful if their order was switched around. There were multiple questions in a row with the exact same content and format, just with different details. When they were put all together, it made the exercise so easy it was almost pointless.
Same here, not sure if I have it or how I can even figure that out?
#feedback It would be helpful to have a quick lesson on phrases that are often seen on LSAT questions that are weird and abstract because we don't use them in regular speech. For example, "takes for granted" colloquially means something totally different than it does on the LSAT, and there are lots of other phrases like that. Those phrases often trip me up and cost me time. I'd love to have a list of some of those weird common phrases and what they mean in the context of the LSAT, kind of like the "over and under inclusive" lists of premise and conclusion indicators, so I can print it out and refer to it often.