I remember at the beginning they told us we should not use outside knowledge for the test. Are we supposed to use outside knowledge for this concept?

That hurt my head

I don't understand number 5

With the description on each answer makes me believe I can do it on my own but scared to get shown I don't actually know what's happening :/

I'm having trouble understanding what the passage is trying to say...any suggestions?

I don't see the difference between A and B...I thought it was A based that it said "If->then"

Are we able to have a paper doing the test and write down our our concepts as we read?

Kinda scared that I'm going to stumble on a big word and don't know what it will mean

question...wouldn't the referential "those" be for tablet or soft-gel form? someone explain on why that isn't it.

I don't see how that is the Concession for number 4...

did anyone else think that number 5 was like this?....

Premise: When an acidic liquid such as vinegar is added to baking soda the resulting mixture fizzes

Conclusion: No fizzing occurred when some of the liquid in this bottle labeled “vinegar” was added to powder from this box labeled “baking soda.”

Finally getting the trick of this :)

I keep making the same mistake of sufficient and necessity... how can I stop doing this?

I need help with identifying a sufficient condition and a necessary condition

gold medal

What is the ideal time for me to answer these questions?

Would it also be safe to negate #3 like "Anywhere from none to 3 inches of snow accumulated, then classes will not be canceled."

Couldn't #2 also be negated by "No alphabets are phonetic"?

and #3 could it have also been negated by "all pilots are blind"?

Can someone point out an LSAT question where this would occur or be helpful to know.

Can someone point out an LSAT question where this would appear

I keep getting the V. Low priority right and V. High priority wrong... Any advice on how to start improving on the High priority ones?

was between B and C. I chose B then changed to C, always sticking to my first option from now on.

these answer choices hurt my head

Choose C on the assumption that the person testifying about their past mistake helped the author's 1st point about credibility.

I understand the concept and can describe it out loud and in my head but have trouble diagraming it. Does it matter?