Why would B not be seen as at least a sub conclusion, seeing that it is a claim that "it will deteriorate beyond repair" and is supported by the first sentence?
I'm struggling with this section only bc after WSE, PSA, SA, and NA I am wasting time/getting distracted reading the stimulus substantively. I need to focus on structure to save time for the ACs!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Hold on there, you need to slow down.
We love that you want post in our discussion forum! Just come back in a bit to post again!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
43 comments
FINALLY holy cow
tricky one because there are two arguments so need to distinguish which prem and con are author's and which ones are of the opposing view/arg
10/11. Woo!!! Wish LR was just this.
I went over the time by like 25 seconds chose C. Almost chose B in BR but glad I stuck with C
i feel like more should be added to understanding choice D
Got the correct answer but did anyone else spend way to much time on E?
54 seconds. this is the only one that just clicked
A quick glance at the question stem...
Nailed it!
Oh my god I love this section can LR just be this
Thank goodness, I really needed to get one correct before I ripped my hair out
I am sooo back
feeling so powerful after flopping the NA questions :)
Yay
Wow I hate these questions with a passion
It's like a rewarddd.
Am i the only one not enjoying these?
when you come along some questions that you enjoy doing and not make you want to end your existence
Why would B not be seen as at least a sub conclusion, seeing that it is a claim that "it will deteriorate beyond repair" and is supported by the first sentence?
Lmao these are actually kind of fun.
Is the Argument-Part drill down for anyone else?
very suprised i got this wrong
These are kinda fun!
I'm struggling with this section only bc after WSE, PSA, SA, and NA I am wasting time/getting distracted reading the stimulus substantively. I need to focus on structure to save time for the ACs!
justice town charter