Hi! Wondering if anyone that works FT would like to be in a study group together? It can feel so isolating to do this by yourself and I'm wondering if others would like to connect.

Anyone getting ready in the area?

Hiii!! Anyone in the Montgomery County, MD area taking the September/October LSAT and want to study together and hold each other accountable. I am registered for the September LSAT and will be taking October as a fallback and would love to drill/take practice exams with others to help me get the best out of the rest of the time I have left. Please lmk!!!

Hi y'all,

I'm looking to find study buddies in-person or virtually so I can hold myself accountable.

A little about myself...

• I just started studying and I'm in the ~145 to 150s range

• I'd prefer to meet in-person regularily every week

• Please do not chat with me when we are studying or I will go on a tangent :(

• I am located around the Seattle areas so I'd love to make some more friends who have the same goals in mind!

Nice to e-meet everyone!!

Looking for others down to study by Tufts in Boston! We could each do our own thing but be silent together. My ig is @ arianamathews_ if anyone wants to message me on there!

I am having such a hard time reviewing practice tests by myself. I feel like I become so unmotivated. I feel like it could be super beneficial to get a group together and take the same practice test during the week then join a zoom to review the test. Would anyone be interested in this?

Hello! My name is MJ or Madi, I am from Canada, timezone CST. I am looking for a study buddy and body double to call and work together. Bonus points if you also have ADHD so we can help each other by body doubling! Please feel free to reach out!

As the title says, Glendale California study group! Recently graduated from uni looking for friends to get together, drink coffee and study.

Hi everyone, I live in Arlington and work in the Irving Coppell area. Looking for a study partner/group. I have adhd so body doubling is the best way to get me to study. Looking for someone who can study together in silence but can also talk out difficult questions with me whenever we are confused. We can study virtually and in person whatever works best.

Looking to build an in-person LSAT study group in Arizona for people currently scoring around the low 140s who are seriously aiming for the high 160s/170+.

I’m hoping to find a small group of people who are willing to actually study consistently, review mistakes, do timed sections/PTs, etc..

Looking for:

• Arizona-based and able to meet in person

• Currently around 140–145ish

• Goal of 165–170+

• Willing to study consistently

• Open to explaining questions and learning from each other

• Interested in timed sections, blind review, and full PT review

I’m thinking Chandler/Tempe/ASU area, but I’m open to coordinating based on where everyone is located.

If you're in a similar score range, comment your approximate score, goal score, and what area of Arizona you're in so we can see if we can put together a small group! To meet in library's or cafes!

Hi! I'm looking for a study partner whos there to keep us both in check with our study schedules!! Any score is fine, but I'm hoping to reach a 165+ in time for the november lsat :))

Hi, I am currently scoring in the 160s on practice tests, and I am looking to get a 170 on test day (November). Let me know if you are down to be study buddies!

Hi all! I'm looking for a study buddy that's currently scoring in the 160-170 range, and hoping to score 170+. I've been studying for about 5 months now, and haven't been making as much progress as I'd like. I'm scheduled to take the September LSAT, and I've received a lot of tips that talking through and debating answers with someone else in a similar score range can be really helpful. If anyone is in a similar boat, I'd love to complete a few sections individually and then meet via zoom to BR them together.

Hi, I'm looking for a study group/ friends to study with, in person or virtually, in Florida!

Hi, I planning to take the LSAT November 2026 and looking for 170+. I have been working for a month not so consistently and would love to work with others to be accountable and motivated. Let me know if anyone is interested in working together!!

Hi all, I'm newish to the Detroit area and would like to find like-minded community. I plan to enter the '27 school year, so I am looking for folks who are also in the process of LSAT studying and applying.

Hey! Anyone in Austin, Texas down to form a study group? I'm planning taking lsat in October <3

Hey everyone! looking to get a NM group together I'm registered to take the LSAT in OCT. I'm local to the ABQ area but was thinking if people are spread out we could host video calls once per week and do local meetups whenever!

Feel free to comment/DM me or join the group :)

Hi everyone! I am planning to take the LSAT in November. I am looking for a virtual or in person study group. I am happy to create one. I am thinking to do virtual during Mon- Thur and in person Friday - Sunday. We can work out the details later, let me know if you would like to join. (:

Hey San Diego LSAT studiers, I'm looking to create or join a San Diego study group. No score range necessary. We can do zoom or meet up study sessions, whatever helps us stay on track and progress😌!

Hey everyone! I’m looking to see if anyone in the 140s–150s range would be interested in doing some LR drills together.

I’m currently scoring in the mid-160s to sometimes 170s, and I think it would be really helpful for both me and you to talk through reasoning. Sometimes, trying to do all the work in your head is just excruciating and not so exciting either.

Please DM if interested!

Hi friends!! <3

I’ve been spending a lot of time studying at different libraries around the city lately and thought it would be a good idea to do a study session at a library or café with anyone who’s interested!

I feel like studying together could be really beneficial for motivation, accountability, and helping each other when we get stuck. Let me know if you’d be down to join!

Hey guys im looking for some study partners to romanticize this whole experience a little bit more. If anyone is located in the LA/ valley area lmk !!

Hi all, haven't seen a group like this, so I decided to start one myself. So I have pretty bad ADHD and need accountability partners. The good thing is I easily get hyper-fixated, so when I'm studying, I'm super locked in.

The main reason for this group is that I figured I think through questions a bit differently from typical explanations, and I was wondering if any other ADHDers or neurodivergent folks feel the same. Hoping to host virtual Zoom sessions to hang out with and discuss questions together.

A bit about me:

• Located in the LA area, Pacific Time Zone

• Free in the afternoon and evening mostly

• Taking the September + October LSAT

• Started studying a month ago, currently scoring in the low 160s, aiming for 170+

• I talk to myself a lot

• I was bitten by a radioactive spider

Hit me up or join the group! Really excited to form a community here.

Question:

All libraries and bookstores are intellectual places. Most well-stocked intellectual places showcase a wide range of books on various subjects. But if an intellectual place is disorganized, it is not well-stocked.

Analysis:

See the library one is technically a formal argument, it sets two conditions (p) = All libraries and bookstores are intellectual places, AND (q) = Most well-stocked intellectual places showcase a wide range of books on various subjects. Charted this looks like (p) ^(q) > X The statement (g) = if an intellectual place is disorganized, it is not well-stocked. Cannot equal X because it violates the condition of (q) that is " it is not" infers NOT(q)… That is being "not well organized" does not equate to "a wide range of books on various subjects". It just means we don't have enough information to draw a valid conclusion, or to prove the conclusion true or false. A NULL conclusion is still a conclusion, it just sucks at its job. If the last sentence said "has a limited selection" instead of "is disorganized" it would be a valid conclusion.

When people imagine or have delusional answers to ideas, formally called "Besires" in philosophy, you get this kind of argument structure. In fact, that is what most of the "God of the gaps" domain of argument in religion is. This is a really common thinking trap absolutely, but I don't know that it was represented correctly here.