All posts

New post

344 posts in the last 30 days

Looking for people around the East Coast to form either a partnership or study group. I am a rising college Junior planning to take the LSAT in June of next year and have just started studying. Intending to begin by reading Scott M. Sullivan's An Introduction To Traditional Logic: Classical Reasoning For Contemporary Minds along with 7Sage curriculum. Aiming for a score of 170+. As I work full time I'm available from 7:00PM-12:00AM most days with a great deal more time available on days off.

0

Hi guys,

I know that it's not good to start in the Spring semester compared to the Fall semester but let's just say that I start in the Spring semester then plan on transferring after 1L to a better law school.

Is it actually possible to transfer after 1L with spring semester start? or do you know any schools that do accept?

I know that you can for the Fall semester start and I know that it's going to be difficult and people will say I shouldn't attend if I plan on transferring to a new school.

But besides all that, is it possible?

Any experience or opinions?

Thank you.

0

I can't believe I'm in this position! Does anyone have any insight on how likely it is to be accepted from the WL after an interview? Do they interview a lot of people on WL to give themselves options? Or do they interview people they are likely to accept. Any advice is appreciated!

10
User Avatar

Last comment tuesday, jun 04 2024

Houston Study Group

Hello! I am planning on taking the LSAT in August. Does anyone want to study together or begin a study group chat? I work full-time, so my best availability is evenings and weekends.

2
User Avatar

Last comment tuesday, jun 04 2024

October 2024

I am testing tomorrow for the second time. I got a 164 in April. (I've seen a 167 twice). If I need to, I will retest for a third time in October. I need people who are dedicated and consistent as accountability partners. My goal score is 170s because I want to be an LSAT tutor eventually. Please DM me if you are interested.

Thank you

0

Hello aspiring lawyers!

I am taking the August LSAT and was wondering if anyone would be interested in studying and cracking the LSAT (LR&RC) in preparation for the upcoming August LSAT. Please let me know!

Nathaniel Green IV

Admin note: Edited title. Please do not post threads or comments in all caps. This is against the Forum Rules. Thanks!

0

Hi guys, Does anyone else feel like they are improving but it is not translating to a better LSAT score??? Like I feel I'm getting to more questions more efficiently and I have a better grip on the test but yet I'm not improving. I'm feeling a bit discouraged still stuck in the 140's. Wanted to know if anyone else has experienced this or feels the same way.-Eric

6

Hi there! I have just started 7sage and am a little confused what my study schedule should look like. I have just completed my first prep test - but should I have watched videos before that/I don't see drills or practices listed on my customized study schedule?

0

Hey 7Sagers,

I'm happy to announce that our next round of classes is available for purchase! Get up to 40% off on in-person classes until June 17th!

Each class is led by a top-scoring 7Sage instructor and offers a chance to build community with fellow aspiring lawyers. All of our classes come with a free three months of 7Sage Core + Live so that you can take advantage of all our digital resources alongside the class's custom program.

Our virtual classes starting next week are an option for 7Sagers outside our in-person cities or who prefer a virtual environment. They also include the three-month subscription and follow the same curriculum as their in-person counterparts.

Learn more about our courses here!

Not sure which class is right for you? Or just have some questions? Book a free consultation here!

Courses available in:

-NYC

-LA

-DC

-Toronto

-Boston

2

Hello,

I am a bit lost on how frequent I should be taking PTs. I took a diagnostic test a while back, but haven't taken one since as I am still working on the LR lessons. I have heard a lot of mixed advice on how often to take PTs, so I guess I am just wondering how often you all take PTs. Should I take a PT 2-3 times a week once I am finished with my LR lessons? Or should I begin taking them now? I also plan to take the Aug. test.

0

I’m trying to gauge whether or not my experience is normal.

How much time does everyone spend on reading the passage? JUST reading it, not answering the questions.

Every time I review a test or drill, 7sage tells me I’m spending about 2-minutes per passage while also telling me that my target time should be closer to 7-10 minutes. I’m not getting every question correctly so that’s not even a flex. I seem to be struggling to slow down but maybe this is just growing pains.

0

Since this upcoming June test will be the last test that includes the Logic Games are we predicting the games will be relatively easy or relatively challenging? For example PT 80 Logic Games were extremely hard for me, I couldn't even finish the section. Whereas the LG for the June 2007 PT were relatively easy? What are your thoughts?

0

Hello,

The previous prep tests that included LG had PDF versions of them. I usually like to print them out and take them that way so that I can mark it up. I don't see PDF options for the new prep tests. I'm retaking the test in August and was wondering if 7Sage will provide PDF versions of the new PTs.

Thanks,

0

I just began the 7Sage curriculum and want to take a diagnostic test to identify my starting point. I plan on taking the test post August 2024. Is there a test that I should take or do I just pick one? I figure I should start with the older ones now and save the most recent tests for later?

0

I really don’t understand where this rule ” For conditionals, A and B negates to A → /B ” came from or how it would be applicable to the actual exam. This comes from the Negation skill builder in the Logic of Intersecting Sets module. It was never stated beforehand in neither the negating conditional statements or elsewhere, at least to my knowledge. I understand it intuitively as you’re saying that rather than both A and B being true simultaneously, you’re positing that /B is a necessary condition of A and thus can’t exist together. However, we previously learned about negation of the conjunction “and” in conditional relationships as being A and B → C negated to /C → /A or /B as specified by De Morgan’s law. I guess I’m just struggling to see, how to tell the difference or when/how to use this new rule in context with a question on the LSAT. Is the rule just referring to when you have both premises A and B as part of the argument a way to negate it, is by using that rule. Like I don't see how just A and B can exist on their own in question. I feel like there must be either A and B -> C or C -> A and B included when encountering this in a question. Greatly appreciate any comments or help someone could add!

#Help

0

Taking the June 2024 LSAT and I've put up some pretty good scores on each section. I've hit -1 on LG, -2 on RC, and -5 on LR. The only problem is that I've never come remotely close to doing all of that on the same test (for example, when I got a -5 on LR, I got my worst ever score on RC; the very next practice test THE NEXT DAY, I got a -2 on RC and put up my worst ever LR score). I'm done with practice tests before test day, but does anyone have any tips on what I can do to brush up and prevent splitting so dramatically?

0

Confirm action

Are you sure?