Could someone explain what I’m not seeing here? While I get why C is right, A is supported as well. The video explanation just ruled it out without offering an explanation.
The question is about what the author will be more like to agree with. A is basically saying that we are unlikely to assemble a jury capable of rendering an impartial decision due to the flaws in voir dire.
The author should agree with this because:
He claims the way the questions are phrased by the judges are problematic
Jurors don’t answer truthfully because they don’t want to participate in jury duty
There are those who overestimate their ignorance of a case.
The entire paragraph is about a judge’ favorite that is flawed-thus making the selection of a jury that will render an impartial decision a daunting task
These are valid reasons to draw such a conclusion-voir dire is flawed in a way that it is unlikely to select a jury that is capable of rendering an impartial decision.
Admin Note: https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-27-section-3-passage-1-questions/