PT24.S2.Q24 - no mathematical proposition

skrishnanskrishnan Alum Member
edited October 2017 in Logical Reasoning 209 karma

I got the question right, but any idea how to translate this into lawgic?
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-24-section-2-question-24/

Comments

  • thisisspartathisissparta Alum Member
    edited October 2017 1363 karma

    We're provided with a premise and conclusion. We just have to fill in the blank by deploying the A -> B -> C strategy.

    Given Premise: Mathematical proposition -> /True by observation

    A->B -> C: Mathematical proposition -> /True by observation -> /Know that it is true

    Given Conclusion: Mathematical Proposition --> /Know that it is true

    We have to look for an answer in the ACs which highlights the B -> C relationship. AC (E) does this perfectly by utilizing a contrapositive of B -> C (know that it is true --> true by observation).

  • skrishnanskrishnan Alum Member
    209 karma

    @thisissparta Thank you for your prompt responses :) Good to know I'd mapped it out correctly!

Sign In or Register to comment.