Would love to hear everyone (especially top scorers) weigh in on this--
Do you ever, in the course of doing an LR/LG section [under timed conditions] find yourselves selecting an answer choice and moving on WITHOUT continuing reading the other remaining answer choices? I know the proper approach in selecting a correct answer is to both identify the correct answer, AND to decisively eliminate every single incorrect answer, but sometimes you come across the correct answer choice that you've already anticipated while assessing the stimulus, and you know it's 100% correct before reading all the other answer choices. The reason I ask about this is because after drilling so many PT's, I still struggle with finishing all the test sections on time, and that amounts to lost points. So, I wonder if it would be the right strategy to pick the right answer and move on without reading all the remaining choices, (in those few cases where I do anticipate and identify the right answer with 100% certainty) in the interest of time?
Comments
So I really do feel more comfortable when I eliminate every incorrect answer in addition to selecting the correct one. But, time is a factor and there is a trade off. I can finish an LR section working through every question that way; but if I do finish, it always comes down to the wire and that’s a big if. If I don’t finish, I sure do wish I had that time back from eliminating wrong answers after having confidently selected the right one. So I pick and choose when to work through every answer choice based on how conducive the question is to anticipation. So on a sufficient assumption question, for example, I will know exactly what I need going into the answer choices. If the stim presents an argument that says A —> B, A therefore C; I know I need an answer choice that says B —> C. So in this scenario, how would I eliminate an incorrect answer choice? I would eliminate it because it is not B —> C, it is wrong because it is not right. This is an important distinction. If this is how the process of elimination proceeds for a question, I simply find the right answer and move on. I box the question number, and come back to it at the end if I have time.
Too many times have I thought an answer choice was obvious, only to find another good answer choice after reading every option, which would then prompt me to re-read the stimulus and answer choices more carefully. This has saved me from falling for attractive wrong answers more times than I can count.
Keep in mind that, even though we are taught that every wrong answer is 100% wrong, the LSAC wants us to find the "best" answer. Sometimes, there's an answer that, with the right amount of mental gymnastics, CAN work. That's why I at least put my eyes on every single AC (unless, of course, I'm just actually out of time, and I need to move on-which almost never happens anymore).
Another quick question re: I keep seeing this first 15 questions in 15 minutes/first 10 questions in 10 minutes pacing strategy mentioned throughout the forum. But is it actually true that the first 15 questions are generally easier than the last 10 or so? Is this by design? I've never seen this officially acknowledged anywhere by LSAC, so I'd like to know how/where everyone is getting this impression from.
Also, “pulling a 180” does not mean what it used to mean to me, haha.
This was great )
Three comments and one recommendation:
1. Note how difficulty jumps considerably beginning in the early teens.
2. Note how difficulty drops toward the end.
3. Some of the late teen/early twenties will be time-consuming (not necessarily difficult) questions.
Whatever strategy used, there is an advantage to at least attempting every question and going back as needed. Hope this helps.
Furthermore, even though you'd still have 7-8 questions to go back to, to have gotten eyes on all 25 questions in a section by the 25 minute just takes the pressure off the psyche. The shoulders relax. There’s less panic. You can just take in the words, see the forrest for the trees, spot the assumption and work through the answer choices more quickly.
And while it’s only one example, it clearly worked for the girl in the video. She went -1 on that section.