@theLSATstruggs said:
Wtf were any of the RC passages trying to say??? I couldn’t get a solid grasp of the MP on any of the 4, and I didn’t feel sure about ANY of the answer choices that I selected....literally not one. And while I’m not usually great, I’m actually not completely terrible at RC. #panicking
Was the question about the author’s tone/attitude In the14th Amendment passage “noxious aspects”?
@Nefertari said:
Was the LR with question about apartments in old buildings real?
Yes that one was real!
Thanks! But ugh I thought that one was experimental bc the questions felt really weird.... like the dogs/cats one.. and the MBF question about liking people and respecting them. Gahhh.
@theLSATstruggs said:
Wtf were any of the RC passages trying to say??? I couldn’t get a solid grasp of the MP on any of the 4, and I didn’t feel sure about ANY of the answer choices that I selected....literally not one. And while I’m not usually great, I’m actually not completely terrible at RC. #panicking
Was the question about the author’s tone/attitude In the14th Amendment passage “noxious aspects”?
@Nefertari said:
Was the LR with question about apartments in old buildings real?
Yes that one was real!
Thanks! But ugh I thought that one was experimental bc the questions felt really weird.... like the dogs/cats one.. and the MBF question about liking people and respecting them. Gahhh.
Oh yeah! the dogs and cats one... The MBF was conditional logic.
Was the LR section with the question about aerobic exercise vs weightlifting affecting math performance, real? I hope it was. The other section killed me.
Sigh I feel like the test was super easy and I just got pressurised by the time which is my biggest weakness! I feel like the LG was soooo easy no overload of complicated conditional
Rules and only One rule substitution question? Anyway I had the following order
LR -
RC - law, horses, music (wtf was that?!?! It was French to me) and seismic activity
LR -
LR-
LG - I think it was scheduling on 7 weeks? Assigning in booths? Can’t remember the other 2...
I really think I am going to take it in November again. I just need to manage my time. I feel like the questions on LR were fairly easy I just went dumb cuz of time
Pressure.
@wrasschaert said:
Does anyone know which LR is experimental for this sequence:
LR(26)-RC-LR(26)-LR(25)-LG
Thanks.
Some are saying the 1st section, others are saying the 3rd section (2nd LR). I also read even if you have the same sequence, the experimental can be in different spots.
@keepcalmandneuron said:
Couldn't grasp what the two authors (A and were talking about on the opera passages...
Same. Both of the passages had me extremely confused. I had to guess on some of the questions due to lack of time...since it took me sooo effing long to get some sort of idea what was going on.
My first two LRs had 26 questions each and my last LR had 25. I'm assuming that one of my first two LRs had an experimental.
In S1 LR, I had a question about Freud? I'm not sure if I'm spelling it right...
In S3 LR, I had a question about the economist talking about small and medium businesses.
Does anyone remember any one of these questions and if so, can identify which one is the EXP section? T.T
My first two LRs had 26 questions each and my last LR had 25. I'm assuming that one of my first two LRs had an experimental.
In S1 LR, I had a question about Freud? I'm not sure if I'm spelling it right...
In S3 LR, I had a question about the economist talking about small and medium businesses.
Does anyone remember any one of these questions and if so, can identify which one is the EXP section? T.T
The economist one (which also had something about bumblebees) was the real LR
@wrasschaert said:
Does anyone know which LR is experimental for this sequence:
LR(26)-RC-LR(26)-LR(25)-LG
Thanks.
Some are saying the 1st section, others are saying the 3rd section (2nd LR). I also read even if you have the same sequence, the experimental can be in different spots.
Ah, I see. That was my only hope of figuring out which LR is experimental. I can't remember which section had what questions, too many questions. Only LR question I remember for sure is that Section 2 had a difficult disagree question about pharmaceutical patents, early question too. And so, the wait begins...
@sunflowersandlaw said:
I don’t know if I agree with Powerscore. I felt like it was a -11 and even a -12 curve. Felt like Sept 2017’s test in terms of difficulty.
Sorry for my ignorance, but what is this -10, -11, -12 curve mean? Is it how many you can miss and still score a 170?
Does anyone happen to recall what the last question or last couple questions on the real LR section with the kindness question was? Very concerned I misbubbled and missed one
@wrasschaert said:
Does anyone know which LR is experimental for this sequence:
LR(26)-RC-LR(26)-LR(25)-LG
Thanks.
Some are saying the 1st section, others are saying the 3rd section (2nd LR). I also read even if you have the same sequence, the experimental can be in different spots.
Ah, I see. That was my only hope of figuring out which LR is experimental. I can't remember which section had what questions, too many questions. Only LR question I remember for sure is that Section 2 had a difficult disagree question about pharmaceutical patents, early question too. And so, the wait begins...
My info could be wrong though! I just snuck a peak at Powerscore's board and saw a lot of all kinds of speculations. But I remember that question so that section is probably real. The one with one about the desert fleas?
My first two LRs had 26 questions each and my last LR had 25. I'm assuming that one of my first two LRs had an experimental.
In S1 LR, I had a question about Freud? I'm not sure if I'm spelling it right...
In S3 LR, I had a question about the economist talking about small and medium businesses.
Does anyone remember any one of these questions and if so, can identify which one is the EXP section? T.T
WEIRD I had LR RC LR LR LG and my first LR had 25 Qs, and that one was experimental!! Did not have a Q about Freud Did had a Q about psychologists prescribing meds tho
I think this test has standard 101 questions. For me it was: RC 27 LR 26 (RC 27 experimental) LG 23 LR 25
I have a (weird) habit to circle the number of questions when I am super nervous lol.
@ahmadhmango said:
What did people answer for the flaw in cat dogs question, my guess was the author failed to consider that Admin note: deleted. Too specific
@PearsonSpecterLittUp said:
Anyone else find the kindness/respect/content question and the fairy ring question to be pretty hard?
Can you expand on the question type i feel like im blanking
Was this the one about the burrowing bugs and dry land patches or something? And they wanted you to strengthen the argument that it was burrowing that caused the dry land?
What is this "sugar sweetener" question everyone is referring to? I had an experimental LR but don't remember that at all. Was it one of the last questions of a section?
Thoughts/Analysis:
LG - I felt like the LGs weren't stupendously hard. Nothing compared to the dinosaur or virus games, but all of them felt like at least 3+stars, and there was a lot of brute forcing required.
RC - The comp passage was probably the easiest. The law passage was very difficult, because it used a two layered logic in its reasoning and the author was ambivalent on the topic.
LR - The experimental section was very difficult. The other LR sections were reasonable, and I would say about average. Not too many time waster parallel reasoning questions, except for a super long NA question.
@Bamboosprout said:
Thoughts/Analysis:
LG - I felt like the LGs weren't stupendously hard. Nothing compared to the dinosaur or virus games, but all of them felt like at least 3+stars, and there was a lot of brute forcing required.
RC - The comp passage was probably the easiest. The law passage was very difficult, because it used a two layered logic in its reasoning and the author was ambivalent on the topic.
LR - The experimental section was very difficult. The other LR sections were reasonable, and I would say about average. Not too many time waster parallel reasoning questions, except for a super long NA question.
@Bamboosprout said:
Thoughts/Analysis:
LG - I felt like the LGs weren't stupendously hard. Nothing compared to the dinosaur or virus games, but all of them felt like at least 3+stars, and there was a lot of brute forcing required.
RC - The comp passage was probably the easiest. The law passage was very difficult, because it used a two layered logic in its reasoning and the author was ambivalent on the topic.
LR - The experimental section was very difficult. The other LR sections were reasonable, and I would say about average. Not too many time waster parallel reasoning questions, except for a super long NA question.
wow...i think you described it perfectly for me
LOL spot on
I felt like it allowed me to perform average. I feel like it was one of the most standard LSATs I've ever taken. I'm hopeful~ Sounds like it didn't go too poorly for you?
Comments
That's what I chose
Powerscore predicting -10 curve?
Never had a thing for horses, never will. :') Sorry horsies
That's what I chose as well.
Yes that one was real!
Couldn't grasp what the two authors (A and were talking about on the opera passages...
Thanks! But ugh I thought that one was experimental bc the questions felt really weird.... like the dogs/cats one.. and the MBF question about liking people and respecting them. Gahhh.
Same. Chose that one
Oh yeah! the dogs and cats one... The MBF was conditional logic.
Was the LR section with the question about aerobic exercise vs weightlifting affecting math performance, real? I hope it was. The other section killed me.
There were 26 questions in one of the LR sections, so I think that means RC had 25
@SomewhereBetween120and180 hmmmm i think the RC had 27... everything is a blur
Does anyone know which LR is experimental for this sequence:
LR(26)-RC-LR(26)-LR(25)-LG
Thanks.
@Raychul123 25?? Oh man I had 27 bubbled. But I was pretty sure I was off by, at most 1. Can anyone confirm?
I’m pretty positive RC had 27!
Sigh I feel like the test was super easy and I just got pressurised by the time which is my biggest weakness! I feel like the LG was soooo easy no overload of complicated conditional
Rules and only One rule substitution question? Anyway I had the following order
LR -
RC - law, horses, music (wtf was that?!?! It was French to me) and seismic activity
LR -
LR-
LG - I think it was scheduling on 7 weeks? Assigning in booths? Can’t remember the other 2...
I really think I am going to take it in November again. I just need to manage my time. I feel like the questions on LR were fairly easy I just went dumb cuz of time
Pressure.
Some are saying the 1st section, others are saying the 3rd section (2nd LR). I also read even if you have the same sequence, the experimental can be in different spots.
Positive RC had 27 as well.
Actually now that you say 27 I think you’re right!
Same. Both of the passages had me extremely confused. I had to guess on some of the questions due to lack of time...since it took me sooo effing long to get some sort of idea what was going on.
Press F to pay respects
This is test is significantly more difficult than June’s. Especially RC and games( time consuming)...
Anyone which was the experimental in the LR-RC-LR-LR-LG test?
I had LR, RC, LR, LR, LG.
My first two LRs had 26 questions each and my last LR had 25. I'm assuming that one of my first two LRs had an experimental.
In S1 LR, I had a question about Freud? I'm not sure if I'm spelling it right...
In S3 LR, I had a question about the economist talking about small and medium businesses.
Does anyone remember any one of these questions and if so, can identify which one is the EXP section? T.T
The economist one (which also had something about bumblebees) was the real LR
I don’t know if I agree with Powerscore. I felt like it was a -11 and even a -12 curve. Felt like Sept 2017’s test in terms of difficulty.
Ah, I see. That was my only hope of figuring out which LR is experimental. I can't remember which section had what questions, too many questions. Only LR question I remember for sure is that Section 2 had a difficult disagree question about pharmaceutical patents, early question too. And so, the wait begins...
Sorry for my ignorance, but what is this -10, -11, -12 curve mean? Is it how many you can miss and still score a 170?
Does anyone happen to recall what the last question or last couple questions on the real LR section with the kindness question was? Very concerned I misbubbled and missed one
My info could be wrong though! I just snuck a peak at Powerscore's board and saw a lot of all kinds of speculations. But I remember that question so that section is probably real. The one with one about the desert fleas?
WEIRD I had LR RC LR LR LG and my first LR had 25 Qs, and that one was experimental!! Did not have a Q about Freud Did had a Q about psychologists prescribing meds tho
I thought the 26 question LR was pretty hard, but the 25 Q one was pretty easy...
What was that fairy ring question though...... ??
I think this test has standard 101 questions. For me it was: RC 27 LR 26 (RC 27 experimental) LG 23 LR 25
I have a (weird) habit to circle the number of questions when I am super nervous lol.
yes about venus gases, kinda fuzzy about insurance sales.
@sunflowersandlaw BLESS YOUR SOUL. You just saved me from a hell load of stress. Thank you!!
@PearsonSpecterLittUp wait so did you have two 25 question lr and one 26 question lr??
YES EXACTLY!!!
Anyone else find the kindness/respect/content question and the fairy ring question to be pretty hard?
What did people answer for the flaw in cat dogs question, my guess was the author failed to consider that Admin note: deleted. Too specific
Can you expand on the question type i feel like im blanking
i chose that as well.
@ahmedhmango Just be careful talking about specific answer choices.
Was this the one about the burrowing bugs and dry land patches or something? And they wanted you to strengthen the argument that it was burrowing that caused the dry land?
Lol, Kafka? Don't think so... would be nice. I would have liked to read about kafka.
https://forum.powerscore.com/lsat/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=25459&start=40
What is this "sugar sweetener" question everyone is referring to? I had an experimental LR but don't remember that at all. Was it one of the last questions of a section?
Thoughts/Analysis:
LG - I felt like the LGs weren't stupendously hard. Nothing compared to the dinosaur or virus games, but all of them felt like at least 3+stars, and there was a lot of brute forcing required.
RC - The comp passage was probably the easiest. The law passage was very difficult, because it used a two layered logic in its reasoning and the author was ambivalent on the topic.
LR - The experimental section was very difficult. The other LR sections were reasonable, and I would say about average. Not too many time waster parallel reasoning questions, except for a super long NA question.
I just realized I answered the MBF question as a MBT
...T_T
wow...i think you described it perfectly for me
LOL spot on
I felt like it allowed me to perform average. I feel like it was one of the most standard LSATs I've ever taken. I'm hopeful~ Sounds like it didn't go too poorly for you?