@MNK-DRKTRDSIGMASLAYER2020 it is amortized each year (so 25K each year)
@Ahmadinejad it was 170
@w.hook17 I had a 3.97 (4.09 CAS GPA), but the numbers wasn't a guarantee-- I got waitlisted at Georgetown before I got the Berkeley decision, so I thi…
@mma23a-1 wait what are you talking about? The August LSAT flex hasn't even happened yet, and I had no idea that there was even a September 2nd LSAT flex...
Forgive me for not quite understanding @SSBM1000 , but how exactly can we assume anything about the people who supported the candidate from the information given in A about the people who believed the accusations?
thanks for your comment @NerfThis ! I can kinda see how C could weaken the argument (because we do not assume that the meter equipment stays on), but I still feel lost about why E doesn't weaken the argument. Aren't there a lot of correct weaken a…
As @danielbrowning208 said, I think foundation is important. However, I would note that if you are someone who learns faster/better through active doing rather than passive listening, I would just jump straight into PT's. I learn better through act…
Yea I think I kind of see what you are saying there @"mhf.andrew": jeez, is there a more reliable way to look at these non-quantified nouns?
Can anyone else bring some insight to this?
@ARMANC74 I am requesting help for a particular preptest question, not the actual flex exam (for preptests, I think it is ok as long as we don't cite the actual text in our question)
I don't think this pre-law summer program sounds worth it (assuming it is just a class that doesn't give you any hands-on legal experience). However, what I would add on is that, even if law schools don't really need legal experience in your resume…
So you are saying @lsatplaylist that the reason why D is wrong is because the stimulus talks about "large areas of farmland" but not all farmland, so D requires an improper assumption that the metropolitan farmland is part of these decreasing "large…
Wait but @lsatplaylist couldn't D weaken the argument by making it so that there is more farmland resources available for animals and/or plants, and as a result, make it less likely that eating meat will constrain our resources to the point that it …
Jeez I think this still confuses me... a car spending more time on road = more pollution OR the same amount of pollution as driving fast; so how is this the same thing as total emission determined primarily by time? Seems sort of like a logical lea…
Jeez, thank you for the comprehensive explanation @jmarmaduke96 , but I am still having trouble with this question. After all, doesn't the phrase, "it has now become clear, however..." (lines 6-7), show that it wasn't clear to these scientists in t…