Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
LSAT Determined
About
- Username
- LSAT Determined
- Joined
- Visits
- 161
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
Thank you @"Dillon A. Wright" . I'm not sure why my prep test says "September 2009, Test form: 92609
-
Thank you for responding and I appreciate you all for helping us students out. As far as "look at how you're asking or what you're asking, because a little effort on your part goes a long way with us". I'm not sure what to say about this because, as…
-
PT58, sept 2009. The question is about democracy and popular artwork
-
I would like to know how to diagram Q#19, Sec5 from Sept 2009 LSAT. I've been looking at this question for hours and still don't see how to connect these ideas to make it a sufficient assumption
-
So what if I want to apply to a school whose deadline is before I get my score back?
-
bump what?
-
What would the necessary assumption be? I already perceived the correlation-causation flaw but couldn't fit that as an answer choice in this necessary assumption question type
-
I think you misunderstood me. I know he hasn't made ALL video explanations for every single question. I'm referring to the video explanations he did make. For example, PT71-#1, I can't hear the volume, but I can see him actually taking the test. Usu…
-
@nicole.hopkins Did I diagram these conditionals correctly???? Please help! J will arrive before either M or N, but not both N-----J------M or M----J----N J will arrive after M or before N, but not both N----M---J or J---N---M
-
Okay, so you're saying these two ideas are identical in meaning in terms of diagramming? 1. Either F or L, but not both, will go before M 2. L will go before F or G, but not both
-
Oh, so it doesn't matter which format I use to diagram them?
-
Thanks. That makes sense. I finally got it, I think
-
Precisely, sometimes those questions can be very confusing, and I have a hard time eliminating the correct answer, since they are so similar
-
Semi, I'm almost finished with 7sage and I recently bought the LSAT trainer
-
I usually get like a 11/12 in LR and probably 13/14 in Logic Games and 12/13 in RC
-
How hard is it to get at least a 155 on the LSAT?
-
in terms of being selected. Is a 150 is as bad as it looks or does the percentile matter more, hence is actually higher than the score number @"GSU Hopeful"