Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
agc438
About
- Username
- agc438
- Joined
- Visits
- 246
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member, ⭐
Comments
-
My first test is in August but I have used it. Generally, I like using the yellow highlighter for facts, orange for mini conclusions, and purple for important thesis/conclusions. I'm not scoring too hot on RC though so there are probably better opti…
-
Yeah, -9 means you still don't actually understand logic games that well. Total understanding is -4 or less usually.... (I'm struggling for that too lol) I recommend using the mid to later tests because a lot of the earlier ones are very irrelevant…
-
Ummmmmm, if you want to record yourself as in your body posture, get a web cam. If you want to record your actual mouse movements/highlighting on the digital test, I recommend recording through XBox with windows button g. It's next to Fn/Alt if you …
-
Yep! Just got my time. Good grief, proctor U needs to be more professional about this and update their systems. Their site shouldn't be crashing like this. It's not like there are millions of users like Pokemon Go on its release.
-
7 sage does grouping and sequencing, with sequencing being in single, double layered and twist. Hope this helps!
-
@oychoi79 said: Ever play the game "RED LIGHT, GREEN LIGHT!" as a kid? That's how I approach RC. Let me explain: As mentioned by the previous commenter, RC is about reading for structure. That means you should be less concerned with under…
-
@"Glutton for the LSAT" said: Hi @agc438: I'm sure the tip of "reading more" helps only if you also try to "read smarter." The quick and dirty trick that I use to get around -3 or less on RC passages—of category, i.e., law, art or sci—is …
-
Omg I'm going through this too. Yeah, so as your test progress, reading comprehension actually becomes less formulaic in terms of what passages they do. From my exp, they used to give a solid one of each genre like humanities, and science, but in th…
-
I'm in the low 160s so I can be totally not qualified to answer your question lol, but yeah, I kind of hit a wall too before. My recommendation for LG is to get the simple sequence and basic ordering games to -0 because the later games will definite…
-
@eh189 said: Since you said you don't know what to do next, I'll share some things I did when I hit a slump in the high 160s (I broke into 177 after doing this and scored 173 June 2021 (first take). My diagnostic was 145): If you struggle…
-
That analytics tab, Keep feeding the beast tests and it will bless you with beautiful red circles where you should specifically concentrate in by rewatching/redoing the syllabus stuff.
-
Don't worry. I'm in the same boat. Rn, I'm scoring 156's on my tests. I think you should start doing tests bc you will def. have a lot left over by August, but that's controversial so take it with a grain of salt. What you shouldn't take for a grain…
-
@canihazJD said: Relatively uncommon (3% of games the last 3 years were "misc" games) but enough that you should be good at them. Just like lots of things that "rarely" happen on this test, they don't until they do... then you'd better know wh…
-
Honestly, I am in the same boat. Ever since Covid-19 started, it's completely derailed my LSAT plans and life honestly sucks. That being said, one tip I've found useful is to look for false equivalencies and whether it be in the stuff you read or qu…
-
OMG CONGRATS! My first diag was a 143 and this gives me hope lol.