Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
agc438
About
- Username
- agc438
- Joined
- Visits
- 246
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member, ⭐
Comments
-
166 LSAT 91st percentile, November 2021. Tysm 7 Sage. I went from a 155 diag to a 166 lol.
-
For LR, I assume you may not be labelling everything or identifying the conclusion in every question. If you identify the conclusion and assumptions, you should be able to easily do most questions, like strengthen, weaken, etc. Good Luck!
-
I highlight the conclusion in LR. RC, I'm definitely adverse to highlighting easier passages and more prone to highlighting the more tough passages, specifically science.
-
@Ashley2018 said: If law schools aren't going to admit anyone after December, then what's the point of them having the deadline be until January/February? Uh...... I don't remember hearing that from anywhere. One of my friends who got a 171 …
-
@"galactic law" said: Hi there, to answer your 2nd question: this is something that is 100% out of your control. The time you spend ruminating over law school admissions data is time lost, never to be retrieved, that you could've spent making …
-
@jenleeva said: @agc438 said: OMG SAME. The only thing I can tell you is to turn off distractions and redo your first ever practice test to see growth. It's hard to get back into the rhythm and you'll have to ease back in 1 game/pa…
-
Honestly, depends on question type. For strength/weaken questions, I usually underline the conclusion and he assumptions for the conclusion. Other than that, usually just the conclusion.
-
OMG SAME. The only thing I can tell you is to turn off distractions and redo your first ever practice test to see growth. It's hard to get back into the rhythm and you'll have to ease back in 1 game/passage at a time.
-
For the people saying taking a break, honestly do what works for you. I just PT'd a 168 even though I was averaging high 150s/low 160s and I haven't stopped doing a test a day. That being said, 80s get pretty bad in terms of LR and RC difficulty. (…
-
Honestly, simple sequence games shouldn't usually go beyond 6/7. There is only one game I can think of where I think it went +8 about groceries I think? If you see 9, 10+ slots, then go double layered sequencing. For recommendations, I would recom…
-
Um, sequence double layering games are pretty standard so the videos should suffice. Granted, if you want to get good at them, you should probably redo PT 31? (The game with the car washes) until you're perfect. My recommendation is to create the t…
-
I'mma college student so my brain starts shutting down at 11-12 pm while starting up after 9 am. That 6:20 pm slot is NICE.
-
All of PT 82. They are all fundamentals.
-
Um... You should be in the 150s unless you still need to go over something because marginal returns usually happen from 155+ where you actually need to start getting sections either just under perfect or ok. I started with a 143 diag and am testing…
-
OMG, I'm the same way. My test is in six days and I can't even concentrate long enough to take a practice even though I've gone through 50 percent of the prep tests. Honestly, I think you should listen to some nice music and write your thoughts and …
-
It's not like Hofstra is a T14, and even then price should be the highest consideration if you're in debt. I would go with the cheaper option honestly.
-
Um... this is a main conclusion question and you seem to have that. Main conclusion questions serve 1 purpose: to regurgitate the conclusion. The main problem is that D doesn't address the public's welfare. "Shortcomings of Journalism" doesn't equa…
-
@ban3rc said: yeah i was averaging in the mid 160's but dipped into the lower 160s on the most recent practice tests. Pt 85 killed me. Anyone else? RC is my hardest section. Praying for a decent RC section on this august exam. OMG SAME. I'm …
-
@"Timmy Is an Avg Kid that No One Understands" said: As someone who took both the April and June flexes, I can certainly say the tests are closer to the 60s or 70s than the 80s OMG really? The 70s imo have some of the most difficult RC (pray…
-
Yeah, if you're getting -11, that means you need to go back to strengthen/weaken/flaw question types and make those more grounded. Those types weren't as prevalent in the earlier LSATs from my study and they became wayyy more prevalent on the more r…
-
@nomomnom said: @agc438 I'm not sure relative to older tests hahah, but you might be right! There are a good amount of them. I'm also noticing more flaw and MSS questions in the 80s. I noticed by checking my analytics and noticing that stren…
-
@nomomnom said: It might be worth reviewing the core curriculum if Strengthening/Weakening Qs are a concern. Other than that, if you are blind reviewing in-depth, you're off to a great start! Are you keeping a wrong answer journal by any chanc…
-
@JMPlaw19 said: Well remember that only one test gets realesed, in the 70-75 there were likely version of the exam that had harder logic games etc, you never know what version youll get on test day I'm not necessarily talking about actual ex…
-
Honestly, there's almost no difference for me so I just get scratch paper. Scratch gives you more room.
-
Does anyone feel that splitting usually works for double layer sequencing games at best? Half of the time I've tried to do it on a harder ordering/sequencing game, it throws three minutes down the drain.
-
So the "new" LSAT is only three sections with an experimental. Just go to your test and check the flex box. Afterwards, go to show results and you will see your "real" score. Hope this helps!
-
Yeah, anyone who says you're clearly going to remember the questions isn't being entirely truthful. I had the same concerns too but to be honest, you probably won't have the mental stamina, (or at least I don't because I'm trying to cram in one a da…
-
Correction: 74. I meant 74.
-
Omg I'm scoring high 150s/low 160s. How do you do it lol. It's so hard and frustrating and I'm not seeing any progress in the last few weeks besides marginal improvements. Thanks for the time for this post
-
@eziff said: @agc438 I'm a bit skeptical about the usefulness of separating the section into these categories you describe while doing timed runs. You're probably not going to find a neat fit for a lot of it and I worry that you're gonna end u…