You mean a wrong answer journal? I haven’t seen anyone else call it an error log but I like it 😎 I personally prefer a computer so I can write and format super long winded notes. Since there are 2 ways to find the correct answer (either find it or …
It took me about a year to go from 149 diagnostic to high-160s. And like someone else said, a 153 diagnostic is great! If anything, keep going with the CC and think about postponing your test date. This test isn't about meeting a deadline, it's abou…
Are you working on LR questions or LG? You should see your lawgic translations pay off there. If you feel like you don't need lawgic to answer the questions, then maybe you're amazing at being able to intuitively interpret these statements.
Get your writing sample over with ASAP, and then you're free to enjoy yourself. You deserve it, and it's the most perfect thing to take your mind off of the LSAT. Second guessing yourself is a waste of energy and you already know that. It's hard to …
A couple things that helped me with grouping games
-how confident are you with different types of numerical inferences? Are you drawing them out as visually as possible? When I started looking for this kind of info, my grouping games definitely imp…
All April test takers will receive their scores on Thursday, April 29, provided they have an approved LSAT writing sample on file. Scores will be released at approximately 9:00 a.m. Eastern Time, April 29, but be advised that with thousands of score…
Can you try blocking out the time? Like if you click on the time remaining during a problem set, it should go away/not be visible. I have a rough idea of what a minute feels like as I do questions so I know when to move on. I also have an idea of ho…
I can't answer everything but have you gone to ProctorU yet to do a computer check? It makes sure that it can access camera/mic/etc and that you have enough RAM (if not, just restart your comp and try again). LSAC has some re-take days to account fo…
I think the argument makes an assumption when it uses 'much greater immune system strength occurred in the patients whose tendency to laugh was greater to begin with' as a premise for the conclusion.
In order to arrive at that comparative conclusio…
https://www.lsac.org/lsat/taking-lsat/lsat-scoring/about-lsat-score-preview
Iirc you can sign up for it now but i'm not sure when you can actually see your score
@obloome Ahhh that's a great point, I missed that! But could you still write it as [/C > /A & /B]? Like functionally, would both statements affect a game in identical ways? Or should I go back to that embedded lesson....
I get what you mean! You can definitely have a different explanation and still be valid, I’ve seen this a lot in study groups. But it’s also possible that it’s an invalid reason to eliminate. Unfortunately I don’t think there is a clear answer becau…
Basically, but until I know why every single wrong answer choice is wrong. I also use foolproofing to make sure my diagramming skills are solid. Great diagramming = inferences coming to the forefront. Usually I do each section 4 times and then more …
You aren’t dumb although I can relate to your frustration. I didn’t see any improvement after 4 months of using a Kaplan and decided to restrategize. I asked people for used prep books, so I could see which one I liked before buying. Ultimately I de…
I also scored a 163 after Trainer and then went onto 7sage (been here the last three months and improved to mid-high 60s) - so hopefully I can help cuz I honestly fumbled through the transition lmao.
I would recommend going through at least some of…
Yeah, I would agree that version becomes a weakener!
LSAT is tricky as hell... we've definitely seen your edited version as a correct answer choice for a weakening question before.
I just BR'ed this PT lol. I took the stim to mean that the increase didn't happen yet. Even if (C) were true, the stimulus says "raising the minimum wage will lead to more disposable income for many people." Both of those things can happen simultane…
I think wires are getting crossed here.
Mistaken reversals: S for N or N for S
-Both these things happen when you jump from that premise to that conclusion
Negation isn't relevant to this. If you negated the conclusion, "it's possible to be conv…
The first premise/conclusion you outlined does both: confuses S for N and confuses N for S.
Mm why do you think they’re not interchangeable? Pretty sure, at least in this case, that they are. I haven’t come across this specifically before.