For RC, do you guys blind review by reading the stimulus and going through the questions? Or do you just forget blind review, and go straight to J.Y. explanations? Or both?
... worst section by far is RC and it was wrecking my ... the test and during my RC section the instructor told us ... remaining. I was on my 3 article and rushed through it ... and my worst section of RC.
So this ... good on 2 of the 3 LR and pretty good on ...
... passages in 3 or less minutes on the older RC's, but ... analogy questions on the newer RC's that if I don ... is required for the newer RC's faster...If I only ...
... have averaged a 172 with 3 or 4 scores of 176 ... on LR overall, and 3-5 wrong on RC. I still have ... to feel as dominant on RC as I do on LG ... , I just don't see RC answers as clear cut as ... . Does anyone have any elite RC tips that can push me ...
... 'm taking an old, timed, RC section every morning before work ... />
My LG is usually 0 - -3 wrong, and I usually only ... my time.
My RC is anywhere from -3 - -10, but I ... sections of it (most likely RC and LG since they take ...
... unmotivated in terms of practicing RC passages, or even blind reviewing ... that I can improve on RC. I don't think I ... can't be said with RC - I always get between -6 ...
Hello all, yes this is another RC discussion topic. I was wondering if I should drill RC sections or just the passages. I have been doing both and feel like I should be completely getting these passages right and understand them before I do timed sections.
How many minute(s) (max-min) do you guys aim for when reading a RC passage with reasonable comprehension? Do you read more for comprehension, or simply for relative placement?