I just did the skill builder for drawing valid conclusions 1 and I can't wrap my head around it at all is there any other better more in depth explanation for it?
Hey everyone, looking for someone to do daily study sessions of a minimum 1 hour (up to 4 hours), mostly consisting of LR. Please only message if you can commit to this/are dedicated to their studying please :) Thanks!
I was looking at the difference between version 1 and version 2 of the curriculum. Both versions look very different in terms of how LR and reading comp is studied. Should I use version 2 to study? I have been using version 1 to study so far.
... the question number itself (ex: 1-13), I can usually assume ... they are the questions within 1-13, I usually assume are ... this and also scratch out 1 answer choice that is meant ... I have begun choosing the 1 of the 2 answer choices ...
... of getting a bunch of 1 question type wrong on my ... PTs, I've been getting 1 of 6-7 question types ... example, I'll get 1 Necessary Assumption, 1 Flaw, 1 Weaken, etc wrong ...
... , there are so many PTs (1 - 69) are you sure you can ... save the later tests (50 -69) for practice but I think ... A answers resolves both mystery 1 and mystery 2. Next." )
... that the latest PT (especially 69, 70 and 71) were easier ... easy-ish games, 1 WTF game and 1 lengthy but manageable game ... but you should definitely practice 69, 70 and 71.
... ’S LAW Lesson 4 of 14 1. and becomes or, vice ... LAW THEORY Lesson 5 of 14
• IF JENNY OR ... />
MASTERY: EMBEDDED CONDITIONAL PROOF Lesson 14 of 15
SPW→(FB ... />
• Revisited: Element of Lawgic 1). → = arrow, implies
2). / = ...
1. IF replacement parts for the ... you connect this with premises 1 & 2 above, it comes ... .com/lsat/blog/2010/05/14/lsat-questions-answers-explanations/