... then move forward to 35+," but I realize this ... />
-Use PT 15-30 to drill timed sections, slowly ...
-Take 1-14 and 31-35 as timed PTs, and do ... then move forward with PTing 35+? This is especially relevant ... all games from 1-35 and drilling the other ...
Clearly I'm having a hard time mapping out logic... Can someone please explain the correct answer? Also any tips on how to improve mapping out logic would be greatly appreciated!! Thanks!
But I was under the impression that conditional statements are not comparisons. I read the first sentence as a comparison and therefore ignored it since I did not read it as a conditional statement. How should I have broken down the first sentence to see ...
I am still confused why the conclusion is adequate productivity --> high- tech technology. I negated the high tech technology part because of the "not" present in the sentence. I tried reviewing my notes and I can't find where he explains in the ...
I don't see how D is incorrect. E is obviously correct, but how is D wrong?
Professor V's book is getting people riled up over the origins of glassblowing (really exciting stuff). If V is right, then there would be not enough evidence to ...
Absolutely clueless on this one. I've probably watched the video 5 times, and I just don't see how B weakens the argument that is in the passage. Also, can someone look at my reasoning for A?