But I was under the impression that conditional statements are not comparisons. I read the first sentence as a comparison and therefore ignored it since I did not read it as a conditional statement. How should I have broken down the first sentence to see ...
I am still confused why the conclusion is adequate productivity --> high- tech technology. I negated the high tech technology part because of the "not" present in the sentence. I tried reviewing my notes and I can't find where he explains in the ...
I don't see how D is incorrect. E is obviously correct, but how is D wrong?
Professor V's book is getting people riled up over the origins of glassblowing (really exciting stuff). If V is right, then there would be not enough evidence to ...
Absolutely clueless on this one. I've probably watched the video 5 times, and I just don't see how B weakens the argument that is in the passage. Also, can someone look at my reasoning for A?
... includes PT 73 and 74. PT 74 I got 177 with BR ... to taking PT 73 and 74, I bought LSAT trainer and ... wrong per timed section. PT 74 I totally bombed the last ...
... LR..? I still have PT 74 available, took 76 and 75 ... | Fri28 Review PT 74 3 hrs. | Sat 28 Review pt74 (Then have ... , Review what I miss. Review 74 more if have brainpower ) | ... on PT 76, 75, and 74 ..( as long as I ... for PT 76, 75, and 74, maybe not watch more than ...