Prior to 7Sage, I used Princeton Review ... did not limit their examples to PT 1-35 like 7Sage did. I ... have any suggestions on what to do when I find myself ... passages or LG sections or LR questions?
For those of you who plan to slug through LSAT over the holidays and would like to foolproof games, please DM if you want to do 5 games per week for the next 7 weeks or at least attempt to get through games 1-35 at least once.
Overall ... you can classify most LR questions by the type ... are looking for. 1. Powerful: AKA answer choices ... a 50 percent chance to get the answer correct. ... answer choices and look to see whats wrong with ...
I found many Level 5 questions from PT 1-35 not only difficult but annoyingly silly. Also, looks like many do not even have an explanation video on this forum?
... go back to tests 80+ and review your wrong answers from those ... tests to gain insight into why ... before. I suggest sticking to PTs 1-35 in the Core Curriculum tab ... an LR section in a 15 minute time limit to force yourself to ...
I'm ripping up old powerscore books but they don't cover the entire first 35 pts. Also, why exactly is 1-35 the range that people use for fool proofing games
... / BR: -4
Section 2 LR: -12 / BR: -6 ... / BR: -0
Section 4 LR: -10 / BR: -4
... I plan on continuing to FP 1-35 by section and the ...
For LR I feel like I know how to solve each ... all my weak areas for LR.
I have fool proofed LG 1-35 and I'm still averaging -8 or -10. I think my problem is I didn't do the weird games that showed up 1-20. Should I just do those games i didn't fool proof or should I start over?
I took a practice test not using 7sage, and wanted to input my answersto get to see the 7sage analytic breakdown. Is there any way to do this without just starting the same PT as I would normally and redoing it with my other answers?
So I did a prep test today and wanted to score my experimental section just to see how I did on the section, is this even possible? Does LSAC release the answersto the experimental sections or no?
Not to step ... if it isn't going to hurt the purse. Of course ... be well served to get every LG from 1-35. Regarding LR, the earlier ... it in the long run to get both.
... be best for me to return to PTs 1-35 and fool-proof em ... better use of my time to continue to take full-length PTs ... is that I can practice LR at the same time, implementing ... this point? (I'm hoping to write the LSAT in June ...
... br />
RC sections are hard to recycle thru the learning process ... on a retake. Even LR, especially for specific questions ... I want to implement, I go back to PT 1-35 or find ... I kept a log to return to them. (I was ... 8ish minute mark to get used to trying a new ...
... while doing 1-35 LG fool proofing), and then start with LR packets ... ; Re-do CC w/ Manhattan LRto supplement
>
> ... is it better to:
>
> Do 1-35 in order ... games in sections times from 1-35 in order?
>
... while doing 1-35 LG fool proofing), and then start with LR packets ... into getting comfortable with -0 to -1.
> >
& ... ; Re-do CC w/ Manhattan LRto supplement
> > < ... it better to:
> >
> > Do 1-35 in ...
... ) and then moved on to foolproofing 1-35 for a little over a ... Saturdays). After I finished foolproofing 1-35, I added in more PTs ... a copy of all the LR questions I ever missed and ...
... 's a skill we need to keep working at. Even if ... again. Add more tests to your 1-35 PTS bundle and get through ... time. You will be surprised to see how much you have ... -Thursday- Foolproof games/ atleast 1 timed LR section or RC section...blind ...
... 's a skill we need to keep working at. Even if ... again. Add more tests to your 1-35 PTS bundle and get through ... time. You will be surprised to see how much you have ... -Thursday- Foolproof games/ atleast 1 timed LR section or RC section...blind ...
... that score and find my answerstoLR don't typically change ... LG because I usually get 1-2 wrong during PT ... manhattan/etc explanations for the LR you miss. When you' ... re this close to the test, it's ... probably better to hone in on weakness and ...