... inferences that games are testing (as are the universal quantifiers). ... since JAN and FEB are Flex tests, I would finish the ... one of your scheduled tests and maybe reschedule for ... believe knowing existential quantifiers are necessary for LG whatsoever- ...
... inferences that games are testing (as are the universal quantifiers). ... since JAN and FEB are Flex tests, I would finish the ... one of your scheduled tests and maybe reschedule for ... believe knowing existential quantifiers are necessary for LG whatsoever- ...
> @GHIGGINS154 said:
> Are the tests different everyday? And then they ... that's the same? Or are they all the same test ... has like 2 sections that are the same as someone who ...
... you build using the old tests translates over to the new ... practiced timing using the older tests before touching the new ones ... look at some of the newertests, but I would say if ...
I hear it takes people some time to adjust to the newertests, but once they do they get back to where they were scoring before. If I were you I'd postpone. IMO 2 months isn't really that much time even with full time study.
PTs are old tests, and every test used to have 2 LR. Even if RC is your toughest section, remember that the experimental section is not scored. While it will challenge your stamina, it won't mean you have to be scored on 2 RC sections.
Taking the full PTs from the newertests is a must. Why don't you take the full PTs and then fool proof them afterwards? It could almost go hand in hand with your BR of the LGs.
... week is too much. PTs are just tests of your performance. You ... you've addressed those weaknesses, are you ready to test again ... review, drill and rest, you are effectively wasting much if not ...
... I think LSAC are making RC harder and keeping LG ... avoid published stories that are condensed for ease of ... find some texts that are verbose, unfamiliar, and overwhelming ... it'll be far harder than anything that will ... an article is way harder than any passage we ...
... just feel "different" in newertests. I don't necessarily mean ... sections seem more emphasized in newertests. Additionally, RC added comparative ... advising that you save the newertests (meaning 80+) for the ... you begin sprinkling in newertests no later than a ...
Not sure what sort of answer you're looking for. If you're taking the Nov LSAT maybe don't do the super early ones but from what I've heard there's not a huge difference between the older and newertests.
I was in a similar boat. I started to drill from PT 1-PT18 (old format) since those PTs aren't included in the new PTs. One can argue that it is not the best option since they are older tests, but the questions are still testing the same set of skills.
I've been approaching 156-160 on my PT's 46-52 however I took PT 80 and scored a 152. PT 80 seemed extremely hard to me. Are the later prep tests getting harder?