Others answered your question. I just want to add, it takes time for the new concepts to sink in. As long as you put in the time, keep on drilling and fool proof the bundle, you will see the improvement.
Cool! Thanks everyone for your advice. I think I'll do PT 36 to hopefully see an improvement from the June 2007 test and then spend a week or two fool proofing 1-36 games.
@"Cant Get Right" I feel like I cannot solve any game without BR it for like 5 times. Is it normal? It takes me so much time to get everything correct and under time. I feel like everybody else is just racing through those.
... shaw said:
Rosenberg cannot evaluate any introductory textbook until Juarez has ... right:
"Rosenberg cannot evaluate any introductory textbook(REIT)" until ... that textbook.= Juarez cannot evaluate any introductory textbook until Rosenberg ...
... other shaky points, and absolutely CANNOT make any "careless mistakes." (I put ... , because there really aren't any "careless" mistakes, but everyone is ...
... , it is easier than finding any decent paid position from a ... />
I also don't seeany downside in applying and seeing ... people who applied just to see their options and ended up ...
@"Not Ralph Nader"
lol
No, seriously...
I wonder why people think Asian students are good at LG...a prof (Chinese professor) I met said no prob on LG, but...why he said so??
I don't seeany perticular math related problem...
LSAC specifies you cannot bring any felt-tip markers to the site. Among the exhaustive list includes:
1. Electronic cigarettes
2. Personal computers
3.Rulers
4. Calculators