I’m looking for any tips for memorizing the logical indicators (group 1, 2, 3, 4 and what to do with each of them). Does anyone have any tips? I tried Flashcards and electronic Flashcards but I’m just not a memorization person.
I seem to be confused on which questions types to expect Alternative-Reversal-Coincidence answer choices when dealing with a causal argument. Is this exclusive to Strengthen-Weaken questions? Thanks in advance for any help on this.
In the CC we're told that the terms For/Since/Because are premise indicators but the conclusion either preceeds or follows the section. Is this the case for **all** LR questions MP questions? Or are there exceptions?
Can you take the contrapositive of a causal statement? For example, if it said that A caused B, and we don't have B, is it logically corrected to say then we don't have A? Or does causation not work like that?
... used to express a potential causal relationship (more than a sufficient ... are conditional with comparative and causal elements (at least based on ... would statements indicating there being causal and/or comparative elements _ ...
... give a list of correlation indicators, as there are so many ... variations without typical indicators. But I would suggest your ... not necessarily result in a causal relation (usually not in LSAT ...