... stimulus ("The law") implies a bi-conditional? That is the only ... - even if it is a bi-conditional, it's not perfectly ... more clearly been intending a bi-conditional relationship, though it still ...
From a logic perspective (see below) I can't work out any meaningful differences, but I noticed that JY splits these off in his map of bi-conditional statements. Am I missing something?
In his video on EC, JY discusses the example A ----> (B---> C), where the embedded part is second, and it becomes A + B ----> C. But what if the embedded conditional is first [(A--->B) ----> C], what would the mechanical rule be then? Do we ...
I haven't come across any I've had to diagram and was wondering how common it is to diagram them and if anyone has examples of these in actual LR questions!
If both ... your answer choices contain conditionals chances are they may ... . Some people think diagramming conditionals takes too much time, ... enough to draw out conditionals, I question whether you ...
How would you diagram “the only thing you need for A is B ” and “the only way to have C is through D”?
Are these two the same statements?
I’m starting to feel like, at least the first one, is a bi-conditional. Thoughts?