... answer choice D, have embedded conditionals (or what I think are ... embedded conditionals) in them. Here are the ... them (i.e., as embedded conditionals? As a simple conditional with ...
So far, I have treated Only A is B as B-->A. So far so good.
Recently, I have come across this question:
Does the statement "only A is B" deny other necessary conditions?
If so, does that amount to A--> (anything not B ) a ...
Say you have premise that doesn't specifically identify whether members are in or out, but is a bi-conditional like:
"Wharton serves on a different committee than the one Zhu serves on"
How do you decide which side to negate? It ends up ...
In his video on EC, JY discusses the example A ----> (B---> C), where the embedded part is second, and it becomes A + B ----> C. But what if the embedded conditional is first [(A--->B) ----> C], what would the mechanical rule be then? Do we ...
I haven't come across any I've had to diagram and was wondering how common it is to diagram them and if anyone has examples of these in actual LR questions!
If both ... your answer choices contain conditionals chances are they may ... . Some people think diagramming conditionals takes too much time, ... enough to draw out conditionals, I question whether you ...
I'm wondering if a strong correlation like "the more X, the less Y" could be diagrammed as a bi-conditional (e.g. "The more history a person knows, the less likely that person likes history"). Also, is " ...