Can someone explain the justification for the answer being E. Seems like that would makes sense if the stem asks for the flaw in David's argument, but it doesn't.
Wow, I just watched all the videos in this series.
http://www.intelligencesquared.com/events/david-eagleman-on-the-on-the-science-of-de-and-re-humanisation-and-why-it-matters/
... come to the party is David
Take our 2 ... party, then you are not David.
Taking the ... : If are you are David, then you do not ... someone" is NOT David. BUT not being David does not tell us ... party), then you are not David.
Hi! I just signed up for the Personal Statement course and submitted my personal statement, diversity statement and addendum for possible review with David....is this ok? If not...you can disregard my diversity statement and addendum. Great idea!!